Reliability-Based Time-Reserve Assessment of Bulk Carrier Accidents Triggered by Solid Bulk Cargo Liquefaction and Dynamic Separation
Sergey S. Kubrin, Sergey I. Kondratyev, Evgeniy V. Khekert, Viktor V. Kondratiev, Natalia Nikolaevna Bryukhanova, Vitaliy A. Gladkikh, Boris V. Malozyomov, Nikita V. Martyushev, Roman V. Klyuev, Antonina I. KarlinaLiquefaction and dynamic separation of moisture-sensitive solid bulk cargoes may remain latent for much of a voyage and then manifest as a sustained heel, leaving a comparatively short interval for emergency action. This study develops an exploratory reliability-based analysis of accident chronology using a source-traceable registry of 35 casualties and incidents. Eighteen cases provided post-heel information suitable for the principal emergency time reserve analysis; the observations comprised exact, approximate, reconstructed, interval-censored, and right-censored times. Descriptive statistics calculated from the selected central values and censoring bounds yielded a mean emergency time reserve TR of 200.99 min, a median of 192.20 min, and a range of 67.50–335.10 min. In likelihood-based fitting that retained censoring, the Weibull model achieved the lowest AIC (212.51) and BIC (215.18), with Kolmogorov–Smirnov D = 0.097 (p = 0.989). The fitted lower-tail quantiles were Q10 = 105.40 min and Q25 = 147.99 min, substantially shorter than the descriptive mean. Robustness was examined using nonparametric estimators, Akaike-weighted model averaging, source-confidence weighting, leave-one-out analysis, and alternative interval assumptions. The contribution is a reproducible framework for converting heterogeneous casualty narratives into uncertainty-qualified lower-tail time-reserve evidence and non-prescriptive bridge–team decision support. The framework is not a physical stability model and cannot replace ship-specific GM/GZ calculations, approved loading and stability information, or the master’s judgement.