Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy for sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: A retrospective cohort study of short-term outcomes
Jian Lan, Yifeng Mao, Chenyang Shi, Qingqing Chen, Shangwen Cai, Xijiang Zhang, Cheng ZhengObjective
To compare the clinical outcomes and prognosis of regional citrate anticoagulation and systemic heparin anticoagulation in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study (2020–2024) included 168 adults with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury who received continuous renal replacement therapy at the intensive care unit of Taizhou Municipal Hospital. Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression were used to evaluate 14- and 28-day mortality, with subgroup analyses performed to assess effect modification.
Results
Among 168 eligible patients, 1:1 propensity score matching yielded 42 well-balanced pairs (regional citrate anticoagulation, n = 42; systemic heparin anticoagulation, n = 42) with comparable baseline characteristics. Hospital mortality was lower with regional citrate anticoagulation (59.5%) than with systemic heparin anticoagulation (71.4%); however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (
Conclusions
In patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy, regional citrate anticoagulation may confer better short-term (14- and 28-day) survival than systemic heparin anticoagulation; however, no clear difference in overall hospital mortality was observed. This potential benefit may be more pronounced among patients with hypertension, meriting further evaluation of tailored anticoagulation approaches.