DOI: 10.4103/ijors.ijors_5_25 ISSN: 2773-1367

Regarding Hand Osteosyntheses in Sub-Saharan Africa, Which Type of Anaesthesia: WALANT and General Anaesthesia: Provides Better Postoperative Comfort?

Hermann Victoire Feigoudozoui, Sévérin Koyonedé, Bolmbaye Privat Gondjé, Sylvain Honoré Woromogo, Eric Dogba, Seydou Gnombena N’golo Koné

Abstract

Context:

Hand osteosyntheses are essential for treating metacarpal and phalangeal fractures, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where trauma is frequent. However, management is often limited by a lack of resources and qualified surgeons. Wide awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) presents an effective alternative to general anaesthesia (GA), reducing postoperative pain and anaesthesia-related complications.

Aims:

To compare postoperative pain between these two types of anaesthesia.

Settings and Design:

An analytical case–control study included 34 patients, equally divided into two groups (WALANT and GA) over 3 years.

Materials and Methods:

Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 1, 6, 24 and 48 h postoperatively.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney and Student’s t-tests.

Results:

The WALANT group had significantly lower VAS scores compared to the GA group at all time points (P < 0.05). Fewer severe complications were observed with WALANT, including the absence of cardiac arrest and better perioperative tolerance.

Conclusion:

WALANT effectively reduces postoperative pain and complications, offering a safe and cost-effective alternative to GA. Its adoption in sub-Saharan Africa could improve surgical management of hand injuries.

More from our Archive