DOI: 10.11648/j.ijls.20260904.11 ISSN: 2640-1908

Redefining Fiduciary Oversight in the Digital Age: Board-Level Liability for Intangible Asset Vulnerabilities and Intellectual Property Loss

Oduyebo Olubisi, Akinsola Kayode, Agboke Mutiu, Adetoye Abeke
Show PDF Cite
The concept of fiduciary duty has long been framed around safeguarding a company's assets and finances. Corporate governance historically focused on safeguarding tangible property and financial assets. Today, the overwhelming majority of the market capitalisation of the world's largest public companies rests on their balance sheet, and the risks to enterprise value are now far more numerous, from catastrophic loss of intangible assets caused by trade secret cyber-thefts, uncontrolled deployment of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and unmonitored open-source code integration than the risks that the Caremark Doctrine was designed to protect against. Originating in Delaware jurisprudence and mirrored in mechanisms under the UK Companies Act 2006, the doctrine of board-level oversight liability has evolved to hold directors strictly accountable for systematic risk management. Today, passively delegating intangible asset risks to IT or legal departments without board-level escalation protocols fails to satisfy good-faith oversight standards. Expanding on recent legal decisions that extend oversight duties to corporate officers, this paper examines global governance failures in the digital age. It proposes a proactive framework that incorporates amended board charters, explicit reporting channels, and specialised insurance reviews to protect intangible assets across international jurisdictions.

More from our Archive