Real-World Validation of an AI-Based Opportunistic Osteoporosis Risk Stratification Tool Using Chest Radiographs in a Male-Predominant Cohort
Kao-Chang Tu, Sheng-Chou Wu, Han-Ting Shih, Cheng-Hung Lee, Kun-Hui Chen, Chia-Hsien HsuBackground: Osteoporosis is a major public health concern and a leading cause of fragility fractures, yet screening with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains limited by accessibility and utilization. Opportunistic artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of routinely acquired chest radiographs (CXRs) may facilitate osteoporosis risk stratification. This study aimed to independently validate a regulatory-approved deep learning model (VeriOsteo™ OP) in a real-world, male-predominant cohort. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2336 patients who underwent both CXR and DXA at a medical center in 2023, including 1688 males (72.3%) and 648 females (27.7%). Osteoporosis was defined as a DXA T-score ≤ −2.5. AI performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with sex-specific subgroup analyses. Results: The AI model achieved an accuracy of 76.97%, sensitivity of 69.67%, specificity of 84.64%, PPV of 82.66%, and NPV of 72.65%. The overall AUC was 0.854 (95% CI, 0.839–0.868). The AUC was 0.825 (95% CI, 0.794–0.854) in males and 0.849 (95% CI, 0.831–0.866) in females. PPV was lower in males than in females (60.00% vs. 83.39%), while other performance measures were broadly comparable. The optimal AI cutoff also differed between males (≤−1.9) and females (≤−2.5). Conclusions: The AI model demonstrated good discrimination for opportunistic osteoporosis risk stratification using CXRs in a real-world cohort. Its moderate sensitivity and lower PPV among males highlight potential sex-related differences in AI-assisted osteoporosis assessment. The model may be most appropriately used as an adjunctive risk-stratification and DXA-prioritization tool to identify individuals who may benefit from subsequent DXA evaluation rather than a standalone diagnostic test.