Real-World Effectiveness of Dalbavancin in Osteomyelitis Without Implantable Devices: A Retrospective Monocentric Study
Giorgio Tiecco, Angelica Lenzi, Federico Cesanelli, Evelyn Van Hauwermeiren, Francesco Rossini, Alessio Sollima, Alice Mulé, Silvia Lorenzotti, Liana Signorini, Francesco Castelli, Eugenia Quiros-RoldanBackground: Dalbavancin (DBV) is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide with activity against Gram-positive pathogens approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Its pharmacological profile supports use in infections requiring prolonged therapy, yet its role in osteomyelitis without implantable devices (OM-WoID) remains off-label. This study aims to describe real-world DBV use in a large tertiary care hospital, focusing on its effectiveness in OM-WoID. Methods: This is a monocentric, retrospective analysis including all patients receiving DBV at ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Italy, from April 2017 to July 2023. The statistical analysis focused on patients who received DBV for either ABSSSI or OM-WoID, with the latter transitioning to DBV after traditional daily intravenous therapy. Clinical, microbiological, and treatment data were extracted from electronic records and stored in REDCap. Effectiveness was defined as infection resolution or improvement; treatment failure encompassed clinical worsening, recurrence or suppressive therapy. Predictors of failure were identified through univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression. Results: During the study period, 157 patients (63.0% male; mean age 62.5 ± 20 years) received at least one dose of DBV, predominantly for off-label indications (66.2%). Early discharge was the most common reason for switching to DBV (66.3%). Focusing specifically on patients treated for ABSSSI (53) and OM-WoID (43), treatment success was achieved in 81.1% of ABSSSI and 90.7% of OM-WoID cases. In the stepwise multivariate logistic regression, older age was independently associated with an increased risk of treatment failure (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01–1.13; p = 0.028), while the presence of multimorbidity significantly reduced the risk (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.77; p = 0.029). Discussion: Our study offers a comprehensive real-world analysis of DBV use in both approved and off-label indications. Although current clinical experience with DBV remains limited, DBV emerges as a valuable step-down option for the management of invasive Gram-positive infections in our setting. Consistent with previous evidence, older age independently increased the risk of treatment failure, whereas multimorbidity appeared protective, likely due to selection bias and the more intensive monitoring, earlier interventions, and tailored management such patients often receive. Our results support a broader range of approved indications for DBV to allow earlier discharge and more efficient use of healthcare resources.