Rationally Modified SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs ACE2 Binding While Preserving Immunogenicity in Mice
Elia Tamagnini, Luca Simonelli, Martin Palus, Tanja Rezzonico Jost, Edoardo Lazzarini, Davide Mangani, Václav Hönig, Markéta Dvořáková, Dominik Arbon, Federica Gambini, Sara Lestani, Fabio Grassi, Lucio Barile, Mattia Pedotti, Radislav Sedlacek, Luca VaraniBackground: While vaccines are designed to elicit targeted immune responses, in some cases, the immunogenic molecules employed can inherently interact with broader host cellular pathways as a secondary consequence. This phenomenon can be exemplified by COVID-19 vaccines. COVID-19 vaccines, including mRNA platforms, use the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as an immunogen to induce the production of neutralizing antibodies. The spike protein binds the ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) receptor on human cells, mediating viral entry and infection. ACE2 is widely expressed across multiple tissues and is a key component of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) that acts as a homeostatic regulator of systemic and local blood flow, blood pressure, cardiac function, fluid balance and immunity. Some studies have proposed the interaction between the spike protein and ACE2 as a possible contributing factor to rare adverse effects observed following COVID-19 vaccination, including myocarditis, pericarditis, thrombosis, and reported alterations in blood pressure, though these mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated. Objectives: As a proof-of-concept approach in vaccine antigen development, we engineered SARS-CoV-2 spike mutants with impaired binding to the host receptor ACE2. Methods: By rational design, we produced and validated in vitro and in vivo spike point mutants that do not effectively bind ACE2. Results: The engineered spike mutants do not effectively bind the human entry receptor ACE2 while retaining the immunogenic properties equal to or better than the wild type spike and thus generate a protective response in animals when used as a vaccination agent. Conclusions: By establishing a straightforward molecular strategy for rational vaccine design, this work demonstrates the feasibility of limiting specific antigen–host receptor interactions while maintaining immunogenicity. This approach may be applicable to future vaccination strategies where antigen interaction with host cells could potentially interfere with physiological pathways.