Radiotherapy-Associated Systemic Antitumor Responses Beyond the Classical Abscopal Paradigm
Yosuke Dotsu, Kazumasa Akagi, Noritaka Honda, Midori Matsuo, Hirokazu Taniguchi, Shinnosuke Takemoto, Hiroshi MukaeRadiotherapy (RT) has traditionally been considered a local treatment modality; however, accumulating evidence suggests that it can induce systemic antitumor responses outside the irradiated field. The classical abscopal effect, defined as the regression of non-irradiated tumor lesions following localized RT, has gained renewed attention in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that RT can promote immunogenic cell death, antigen presentation, cytokine release, and adaptive immune activation, processes that may contribute to systemic antitumor immunity, particularly when combined with ICIs. Clinically apparent abscopal responses remain rare and heterogeneous, and the biological mechanisms underlying these phenomena are not completely understood. Systemic tumor regression has occasionally been observed in clinical settings that do not involve checkpoint blockade, including RT alone, chemotherapy-containing regimens, and central nervous system-directed therapies. These findings suggest that radiation-associated systemic antitumor responses may arise through overlapping immunologic mechanisms involving both innate and adaptive immunity, tumor microenvironment remodeling, and treatment-associated cellular stress. This review summarizes the current clinical evidence and biological mechanisms underlying radiation-associated systemic antitumor responses and discusses emerging concepts extending beyond the conventional RT–immunotherapy paradigm. We further examined unresolved challenges, including treatment heterogeneity, biomarker limitations, pseudoprogression, and difficulties in mechanistic confirmation. Finally, we propose that the broader “beyond-abscopal” framework may serve as a hypothesis-generating conceptual model for investigating systemic tumor responses across diverse treatment contexts while emphasizing the need for cautious interpretation and prospective translational validation.