Quantifying the Interplay Between PRAME Expression and Classical Morphology: A Multivariable Analysis of 954 Suspected Melanocytic Lesions
Frank Friedrich Gellrich, Alaska Kistner, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Narmin Ghaffari Laleh, Claudia Günther, Cosima Hufnagel, Sarah Hobelsberger, Jörg Laske, Stefan Beissert, Daniela Aust, Gustavo Baretton, Nick Reidow, Mildred SergonThe integration of immunohistochemical biomarkers like PRAME (Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma) into the histomorphological assessment of melanocytic lesions is gaining prominence. While PRAME’s diagnostic value is widely recognized, its independent weight compared directly to classical morphology remains underexplored in large, challenging cohorts. This retrospective study quantifies the diagnostic utility of PRAME alongside traditional histomorphology in a high-risk cohort of 954 primary melanocytic lesions (335 nevi, 215 melanomas in situ, 404 invasive melanomas) where PRAME was clinically requested to resolve diagnostic ambiguity. Using Firth’s penalized likelihood regression, a baseline diagnostic model utilizing 13 histomorphological features was established and subsequently integrated with PRAME expression. The pure morphology baseline model demonstrated a high cross-validated area under the curve (AUC) of 0.969. As a standalone marker, PRAME achieved an AUC of 0.895, with a diffuse expression score of 4+ yielding peak specificity (94.3%) and moderate sensitivity (77.9%). Integrating PRAME into the morphological model significantly enhanced diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.980; p < 0.001), establishing PRAME as a dominant independent predictor of malignancy alongside core features like junctional atypia and upward melanocytes (Odds Ratio 19.08 for Score 4+). Analysis of discordant cases revealed that completely PRAME-negative melanomas were morphologically indistinguishable from typical PRAME-positive melanomas. Conversely, diffusely PRAME-positive (4+) nevi exhibited significantly higher rates of upward migrating melanocytes, constituting a critical diagnostic pitfall. In conclusion, while classic histomorphology remains the indispensable gold standard in dermatopathology, PRAME functions as a highly objective, reproducible tie-breaker. The synergistic integration of PRAME with morphological assessment effectively resolves diagnostic ambiguity and maximizes diagnostic confidence in challenging melanocytic lesions.