Propagation of Hydrogen-Subsystem Characteristics to Aircraft Level in a Liquid-Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Short-Range Aircraft
Mario Di Stasio, Vincenzo Cusati, Fabrizio Nicolosi, Giuseppe MeloneLiquid-hydrogen fuel-cell propulsion is a promising option for reducing the climate impact of short-range aviation, but its aircraft-level feasibility depends on the concurrent integration of cryogenic storage, megawatt-class propulsion systems, and thermal management. This paper presents an integrated conceptual design and technology-sensitivity assessment of a 101-passenger liquid-hydrogen fuel-cell aircraft, targeting a 1000 nmi design range and a 2040 entry into service, framed within the European Union FAME project. A JPAD-based aircraft sizing framework is coupled with a surrogate model for cryogenic tank sizing to investigate how selected hydrogen-subsystem characteristics propagate, through mission-fuel and tank-sizing convergence loops, to configuration-level performance and compliance with top-level aircraft requirements. The storage-system trade study identifies 2.0 bar as the most favourable sampled tank venting pressure; relative to the other investigated pressure levels, this solution reduces MTOM and design-mission block fuel by up to 8.1% and 9.2%, respectively. The propulsion-architecture study selects a four-engine layout as the best compromise between one-engine-inoperative performance, spanwise structural relief, nacelle drag, and mission fuel consumption, yielding a 2.6–2.7% lower MTOM and a 3.5–3.7% lower design-mission block fuel than the two- and six-engine alternatives. A technology-sensitivity matrix spanning 51–55% fuel-cell efficiency and 60–100% cooling-line speed recovery reveals a non-linear increase in installed power, aircraft mass, and hydrogen consumption as either parameter deteriorates. For the fixed-geometry FAME baseline, the onset of multiple TLAR violations occurs as speed recovery falls through approximately the 70–80% region, depending on fuel-cell efficiency. Within the assumptions of the present model, maintaining fuel-cell efficiency at or above approximately 53% and cooling-line speed recovery above this transition region therefore represents an approximate feasibility condition.