Prognostic value of simultaneous [ 18 F]FDG‐PET/MRI in refractory multiple myeloma treated with anti‐BCMA CAR T
Bastien Jamet, Huajun Sun, Chloé François, Hatem Necib, Aurélien Monnet, Éric Frampas, Nicolas Blin, Nicoletta Libera Lilli, Caroline Bodet‐Milin, Philippe Moreau, Françoise Kraeber‐Bodere, Cyrille TouzeauAbstract
The aims of this study were to assess the prognostic value for progression‐free survival (PFS) and the diagnostic value (detection rate of multiple myeloma [MM]–related medullary and extra‐medullary disease) of whole‐body simultaneous [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography coupled with magnetic resonance imaging (WB[ 18 F]FDG‐PET/MRI) performed before and after idecabtagene‐vicleucel (ide‐cel) therapy in patients with triple‐class (or more) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). A total of 73 patients were prospectively enrolled in this monocentric cohort, and 72 of them underwent WB[ 18 F]FDG‐PET/MRI imaging before ide‐cel (after personalized bridging therapy). Overall, active disease was detected in 64/72 patients (89%). Multivariate analyses showed that the presence of diffuse bone marrow involvement (BMI) pattern on PET (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.65; 95% CI: 1.16–6.1, P = 0.02) or MRI (HR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.28–5.66, P = 0.009) was associated with shorter PFS. A total of 66 patients underwent [ 18 F]FDG‐PET/MRI for response to ide‐cel therapy assessment. Diffusion‐weighted MRI (DW‐MRI) detected residual disease (response assessment category [RAC]2 or higher according to MY‐RADS) in 9/66 patients (14%) and PET (no complete metabolic response according to Deauville score) in 7/66 patients (11%). Overall, [ 18 F]FDG‐PET/MRI increased residual disease detection to 13 of 66 patients (20%). Patients with residual disease on DW‐MRI (RAC2 or higher) had shorter PFS (HR: 4.11; 95% CI: 1.8–9.4; P < 10 −3 ) than those without (RAC1). Achieving at least a partial metabolic response on PET significantly improved the PFS (P = 0.0046) as well. The combination of [ 18 F]FDG‐PET and DW‐MRI enabled the identification of three distinct risk groups, including a very high‐risk group defined by both MRI and PET positivity.