Prognostic and Predictive Effect of Age in Molecularly Defined Lower-Grade Gliomas
Connor J. Kinslow, Giuseppe Minniti, Paul D. Brown, Michael A. Vogelbaum, Karla V. Ballman, Ann Mercurio, Markus D. Siegelin, Emre Kocakavuk, Kyle Tuohy, Alireza Mansouri, Mehdi Touat, François Ducray, Caroline Dehais, Angelo Dipasquale, Matteo Simonelli, David M. DeStephano, Jack Grinband, James B. Yu, Henry Walch, Mitchell I. Parker, Igor Shuryak, Soumyajit Roy, Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper, Matthew Gallitto, David P. Horowitz, Guy M. McKhann, Michael B. Sisti, Jeffrey N. Bruce, Peter Canoll, Quinn T. Ostrom, Alfred I. Neugut, Luke R.G. Pike, Fabio M. Iwamoto, Simon K. Cheng, Lisa A. Kachnic, Minesh P. Mehta, Tony J.C. WangPURPOSE
Age ≥40 years is regarded as a high-risk feature and an indication for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with lower-grade glioma in clinical practice guidelines. It is unclear whether age remains a relevant prognostic factor for contemporary definitions of lower-grade gliomas in the molecular era.
METHODS
The Prospective Gliomas Research (PROGRES) database contains individual patient-level data from 11 prospective clinical trials or observational registries of histologically defined lower-grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma. We determined the association of age (18-39 years
RESULTS
We identified 1,619 and 1,292 eligible patients in the PROGRES and REGRES cohorts, respectively.
CONCLUSION
In the absence of additional clinical or molecular risk factors, age alone should not be considered an indication for administration or deferral of adjuvant treatment. Practice guidelines should be revised to reflect contemporary prognostic factors in the molecular era.