Professional Malpractice Claims in Implant Dentistry: A Scoping Review

Background and Objectives: This scoping review aims to synthesize evidence on clinical and non-clinical factors associated with malpractice claims in implant dentistry and to identify strategies for prevention. Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines, including peer-reviewed studies published within the last 10 years. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Clinical causes of litigation included improper implant placement, inferior alveolar nerve injury, lack of osseointegration, peri-implant infection, and the use of inappropriate or outdated implant systems. Non-clinical factors included inadequate informed consent, poor documentation, deviation from the treatment plan, and ineffective communication. Conclusions: Malpractice in implant dentistry is largely preventable. Risk reduction depends on accurate diagnosis, careful treatment planning, adherence to surgical principles, and clear patient communication with appropriate informed consent.