DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14131826 ISSN: 2227-9032

Prevalence and Clinical Features of Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lama Ali Buhran, Meshal Bader Almutairi, Shehata Farag Shehata, Syed Esam Mahmood, Awad Alsamghan, Ramy Mohamed Ghazy

Background: Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS/PCOS) is the most common hormonal disorder in women of reproductive age and is linked to infertility as well as long-term metabolic and psychological problems. In the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region, rising obesity, dietary changes, and sedentary lifestyles may be increasing its burden. However, prevalence estimates remain highly inconsistent due to differences in diagnostic criteria and measurement methods rather than true variation in disease rates. Objective: This study aimed to describe the situation by systematically pooling available evidence on the prevalence of PMOS among women in GCC countries and by summarizing the range of clinical features reported across included studies. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We searched five major bibliographic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase) and the Google Scholar search engine for observational studies published up to 1 June 2026. Studies were eligible if they reported PMOS prevalence and related clinical features among women of reproductive age residing in GCC countries. After removing duplicates and screening 570 initially identified records, 25 studies met our inclusion criteria; 24 were included in the quantitative meta-analysis after excluding one high-risk study. Risk of bias was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Prevalence Studies. A random-effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian-Laird method, combined with the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, was used to estimate the pooled prevalence. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic and Cochran’s Q test. Subgroup analyses explored differences by country, diagnostic method, study setting, and publication period. Meta-regression was used to identify study-level factors that explained between-study variability. Results: Across 24 studies involving 77,890 women, the pooled prevalence of PMOS was 17.59% (95% CI: 12.98–23.40%). Country-level estimates ranged from 6.56% in Oman to 23.0% in Saudi Arabia. Heterogeneity across all analyses was extremely high (I2 = 99.6%), and meta-regression identified the diagnostic tool as the single most important source of variation, explaining 42.7% of between-study variance. Studies using structured clinical criteria (Rotterdam or NIH) yielded prevalence estimates around 13–14%, while those relying on self-report or physician diagnosis without standardized criteria reported considerably higher figures (20–37%). Common clinical features included menstrual irregularity (up to 100% of PMOS cases in clinical cohorts), hirsutism (5–100%), acne and oily skin (17–74%), and obesity (17–73%). Awareness of PMOS among women in the region was highly variable, ranging from under 3% to nearly 100%. Conclusions: PMOS is a significant public health concern across the GCC region. The markedly higher pooled prevalence combined with high rates of obesity and metabolic risk in this population calls for urgent, coordinated action. Standardizing diagnostic practices, investing in population-level screening, and developing culturally tailored awareness programs are essential steps toward reducing the clinical and social burden of PMOS.

More from our Archive