Prescriptive Digital Twins and Explainable AI for Human-Centric Industrial Automation
Nikitas Gerolimos, Kyriaki Kiskira, Avraam Chatzopoulos, Christos Drosos, George A. Papakostas, Georgios Priniotakis, Dimitrios NikolopoulosIn the transition toward Industry 5.0, physical human–robot interaction (pHRI) operates as an open bio-technical system far from thermodynamic equilibrium. Traditional industrial automation relies on quasi-static anthropometry and post-hoc checklists, failing to capture continuous neuro-kinematic instability and the systemic cost of assembly defects. This study develops and computationally benchmarks a closed-loop Prescriptive Digital Twin (PDT) that unifies non-linear biomechanics, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), and cyber–physical shop-floor execution. Leveraging open-source empirical kinematics (N = 8151 observations), the edge sensory tier reconstructs the human motor manifold via Takens delay coordinate embedding. By coupling Largest Lyapunov Exponents (LyE) with fixed-grid Shannon entropy (H), the system detects orbital trajectory divergence and compensatory muscular stiffening in real time. Rather than operating as an opaque black box, a game-theoretic TreeSHAP supervisory engine decomposes failure risk within 2.12 ms, autonomously dispatching multi-tier prescriptive policies: dynamic FABRIK-A* Cartesian handover waypoint elevation, non-linear hyperbolic tangent (tanh) cobot admittance damping, and asynchronous REST-API payloads to plant MES/ERP systems for line pacing and recovery scheduling. As an in silico computational proof-of-concept benchmarked through Latin Hypercube Sampling Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000), prescriptive waypoint elevation restores spinal posture, reducing median L5/S1 compressive loading by 48.4% and eliminating NIOSH action limit exceedances (from 18.9% open-loop down to 0.0%), while attenuating cobot velocity tremor by 63.6%. The empirical input derives from a single healthy operator (N = 1) and the Monte Carlo analysis varies mechanical rather than biological parameters, so the findings establish computational feasibility, not population-level generalizability. While physical validation on shop-floor robotic hardware and empirical process-level Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) remain prospective, treating dynamic human biomechanical stability as an endogenous control parameter outlines a candidate architecture for vulnerable-worker protection and, prospectively, resource-efficient manufacturing.