Postural Stability Changes During the 4 Phases of the Half Squat: Kinematics Profile of the Center of Pressure and Center of Mass in High-Performance Weightlifters—A Pilot Study
Emilio Manuel Arrayales-Millán, Miguel Rodal, Mirvana Elizabeth González-Macías, Carlos Villa-Angulo, Karla Raquel Keys-González, Arnulfo Ramos-Jiménez, Isabella Arrayales-Mejia, Kostantinos GianikellisThis study investigated balance control during the half squat by analyzing the relationship between the center of mass (CoM) and the center of pressure (CoP) in five experienced male weightlifters performing segmented squats at five load levels (20–80% 1 RM) across four Power-Based Training (PBT) exercises. The area of the 95% confidence ellipse was quantified using the Vicon motion capture system in conjunction with AMTI force plates. Given the small sample size (n = 5), a dual inference approach was implemented—frequentist repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) complemented by a unified adaptive Bayesian hierarchical model—to mitigate Type II error in low-power scenarios. Regarding the movement phase, a marked effect on center of pressure (CoP) stability was observed, as evidenced by both statistical approaches (frequentist: F(1.65, 6.59) = 19.44, p = 0.002, ηp2 = 0.829; Bayesian: P(β_phase < 0) > 0.999). Although external load did not reach statistical significance in the frequentist analysis (p = 0.177, achieved power = 0.27), the Bayesian model provided moderate evidence of a positive impact (β_load = 0.059, 95% HDI [0.005, 0.115], p = 0.981). The area of the center of mass (CoM) ellipse showed no effects of interest. Limb asymmetries were significant and consistent throughout the experiment (frequentist: 48.01 ± 30.13%; Bayesian: 69.48%, 95% HDI [55.86%, 81.44%], P(AI > 20%) = 1.000) and were not modulated by the experimental condition. CoP-CoM coupling was stronger in the mediolateral direction than in the anteroposterior direction. The findings reveal that phase is the primary factor in postural stability, exerting a modest positive influence discernible only through low-powered probabilistic inference, and that the dual framework strengthens inferential robustness in small-sample biomechanical studies. Confirmatory studies with larger samples are recommended.