Postoperative subclinical nerve injury after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a prospective Electromyographic study
İbrahim Kandemir, Servet İğrek, Rahsan Adviye İnan, Mazlum Bayhan, Hüseyin Zihni, Engin EcevizOBJECTİVES:
To detect early postoperative subclinical nerve injury in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures and to identify associated risk factors.
METHODS:
Setting:
Single Level 1 trauma center
Patient selection criteria:
Patients aged 1–12 yr with Gartland type III and IV supracondylar humerus fractures, normal preoperative and postoperative neurovascular examinations, and treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) between April 2024 and 2025 were included.
Outcome Measures and Comparisons:
The primary outcome was electromyography (EMG)–detected axonal injury of the median, ulnar, or radial nerves, assessed within the first week after pin removal at 1 month postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included identification of surgical and radiographic risk factors for ulnar nerve injury. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors.
RESULTS:
A total of 73 pediatric patients (31 females and 42 males; mean age, 5.68 ± 2.35yr) were analyzed. EMG findings were normal in 74% (54/73) of patients. Axonal injury was detected in the ulnar nerve in 19.2% (14/73) of patients and in the median nerve in 6.8%(5/73), whereas no radial nerve injury was observed. Among the 14 patients with ulnar nerve injury treated with cross-pinning, the medial pin was positioned posteriorly in the sagittal plane in 85.7% (12/14) and in a inferior position in the coronal plane in 100% (14/14). Posteriorly and inferiorly positioned medial pin insertion sites were associated with significantly higher rates of ulnar nerve injury detected on EMG. (
CONCLUSIONS:
Subclinical ulnar nerve injury may occur in pediatric patients with clinically normal postoperative findings following CRPP. EMG detection suggests that injury is associated with a posterior–inferior medial pin entry site. Careful medial pin placement and minimizing operative time may reduce preventable technical risks during CRPP.
Level of Evidence:
Level II, therapeutic study