DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_289_26 ISSN: 0970-9290

Perceptual Differences in Smile Macro-Aesthetics Between Dentists and Non-Dentists in an Indian Demographic - An Evaluative Study

Rohit P. John, Divya Krishnamoorthy, Sunantha Selvaraj, R Ramesh, Rajkumar Gunaseelaraj, Aasiya Salaria

Abstract

Background:

Smile macro aesthetics greatly impact treatment planning and patient satisfaction. Perceptual differences between dentists and non-dentists impact clinical decision-making.

Aim:

To evaluate the perceptual differences in five macro-aesthetic smile parameters between dentists and non-dentists among the Indian population.

Study Settings and Design:

A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted by an online survey in 2023, with participants who were dentists and non-dentists from various academic and professional backgrounds.

Methods and Materials:

A total of 322 individuals were divided into two groups: dentists ( n =183) and non-dentists. ( n =139). Standardized frontal smile photographs were digitally modified to alter five macro-aesthetic parameters: buccal corridor width, occlusal cant, gingival display, midline shift, and smile arc, respectively. Participants rated each image on a three-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) through Google Forms.

Statistical Analysis:

Data was analyzed utilizing SPSS v24.0. Chi-square and Student's t -tests were utilized to compare responses. A P -value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

Dentists showed greater sensitivity to minor aesthetic deviations. Parameters such as excessive gingival display (2 mm) P =0.664 and reverse smile arc ( P =0.33) were perceived as unaesthetic by both groups. Non-dentists were more tolerant of variations in buccal corridor ( P =0.01), occlusal cant ( P =0.01), and midline shift ( P =0.01).

Conclusion:

Dentists care more about symmetry and quantitative differences, while non-dentists care more about how the teeth look in general. Good communication between patients and dentists is necessary to make sure that aesthetic goals match clinical decisions.

More from our Archive