DOI: 10.1200/cci-25-00336 ISSN: 2473-4276

Patient-Specific Computational Framework to Spatiotemporally Forecast Treatment Response and Identify Biologically Informed Radiotherapy Targets in High-Grade Glioma

Sophia Ty, Jeanne Kowalski, Bikash Panthi, Maguy Farhat, Holly Langshaw, Mihir D. Shanker, Wasif Talpur, Sara Thrower, Jodi Goldman, Calliope Custer, Thomas E. Yankeelov, Caroline Chung, David A. Hormuth

Purpose

High-grade gliomas exhibit substantial spatial and temporal heterogeneity, posing a challenge for radiotherapy (RT) target definition. Adaptive RT, which prospectively modifies treatment plans, may benefit from early identification of intratumoral regions likely to exhibit differential treatment response. Apparent diffusion coefficient ( ADC ), a marker associated with tumor cellularity and aggressiveness, is a promising imaging biomarker of RT response. We present a patient-specific computational framework that predicts treatment response and identifies candidate adaptive RT targets from anticipated spatiotemporal patterns of ADC changes (Δ ADC ).

Methods

Using longitudinal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from 21 patients, the mathematical model was calibrated to spatiotemporally forecast tumor cell density immediately after and 1-month post-RT. Predictions of tumor cell density were converted to ADC maps. Δ ADC from baseline was analyzed using Pareto tail analysis. The lower Δ ADC distribution tail was used to classify tumor voxels as regions of increased diffusion restriction (IDR) or decreased/maintained diffusion restriction (DMDR). We compared agreement in categories between measured and predicted Δ ADC from MRI data. Classification performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis across four scenarios combining two time points and two image inclusion strategies (± nonenhancing tumor volume).

Results

The framework achieved a median ROC AUC of 0.88 (0.80-0.93), indicating strong performance in distinguishing IDR from DMDR regions. No significant differences were observed between forecasting time points ( P value: .08) or image inclusion strategies ( P value: .50).

Conclusion

This framework can delineate IDR and DMDR regions, offering a potential strategy for prospectively defining candidate biologically informed adaptive RT targets. Future studies are needed to evaluate their role in adaptive RT planning.