Pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil versus pars plana vitrectomy alone for postoperative endophthalmitis: A randomized controlled trial
Ehab Mohamed Elsayed Saad, Hazem Elbadry Mohammed Mohammed, Ehab Tharwat, Sayed Mostafa Elsayed Abdelhafeez, Ahmed Mohammed Sakr, Mohamed Gaber Okasha, Mohamed Abd Elmoamen Mohamed Saad Eldeen, Nehad Mohammed Yusef, Omar Hassan Salama Selim, Tamer Gamal ElsayedPurpose:
The role of silicone oil (SO) tamponade in pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for postoperative endophthalmitis remains controversial. This study compared outcomes of PPV with SO versus PPV alone in severe cases, incorporating intraocular cytokine profiling and regression analysis.
Methods:
In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 40 eyes with post-phacoemulsification postoperative endophthalmitis unresponsive to initial intravitreal antibiotics were randomized to PPV alone (
Results:
Final BCVA improved more in the SO group (1.5 ± 0.3 logMAR) compared with the PPV-alone group (1.7 ± 0.4 logMAR), although this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.289). Recurrence was observed in two eyes (10%) within the SO cohort compared to eight eyes (40%) in the PPV-alone cohort (P = 0.021). At 8 weeks, intraocular cytokine levels were markedly reduced in the SO group (IL-6: 142 pg/mL vs. 298 pg/mL,
Conclusion:
PPV with SO tamponade significantly reduces recurrent infection and intraocular inflammation in severe postoperative endophthalmitis, leading to trends toward improved visual outcomes. These benefits appear mediated by both anti-infective and anti-inflammatory mechanisms, supporting the use of SO in complex cases.