Paradigm Shifts in Perioperative Management of Colorectal Cancer: Personalization Based on Tumor Biology, Primary Site, and Recurrence Risk, and the Evolving Role of Organ Preservation
Kaoru Yoshikawa, Akira Ooki, Eiji Shinozaki, Eiichiro Toyokawa, Keito Suzuki, Manabu Shiozawa, Shin Maeda, Kensei Yamaguchi, Hiroki OsumiPerioperative treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) is undergoing a paradigm shift from uniform cytotoxic regimens toward strategies guided by tumor location, microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair (MMR) status, and recurrence risk. Four clinically relevant subgroups now shape decision-making: microsatellite stable (MSS)/proficient MMR (pMMR) colon cancer, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/deficient MMR (dMMR) colon cancer, MSS/pMMR rectal cancer, and MSI-H/dMMR rectal cancer. In MSS/pMMR colon cancer, adjuvant therapy is being refined through risk-adapted treatment duration and selective use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In MSS/pMMR rectal cancer, total neoadjuvant therapy, selective omission of pelvic radiotherapy, and watch-and-wait strategies are redefining treatment sequencing and organ preservation. In MSI-H/dMMR colon cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has shown marked activity in both adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. In MSI-H/dMMR rectal cancer, neoadjuvant ICI therapy is being explored as a non-operative organ preservation strategy. In parallel, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is emerging as a tool for postoperative escalation, de-escalation, and surveillance. Across these settings, the maturity of the evidence varies widely, ranging from established phase III standards to guideline-endorsed but still single-arm approaches and investigational strategies that require prospective validation before routine adoption. This review summarizes the current evidence and remaining challenges in biology-, site-, and risk-adapted perioperative management of CRC.