Organ Preservation With Watch and Wait in Patients With Rectal Cancer
Stephanie S. Keeling, Ramy Behman, Chung-Yuan Hu, John K. Lin, Naveen Manisundaram, Jeongyoon Moon, Brian K. Bednarski, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Paula Marincola Smith, J. Joshua Smith, Michael G. White, George J. ChangImportance
With growing evidence and evolving guidelines, organ preservation with watch and wait for stage II to III rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly implemented. However, the true frequency of watch-and-wait use is unknown.
Objective
To estimate rates of intentional organ preservation with watch and wait by evaluating secular trends across age groups.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB), with analyses conducted in September 2025. Patients with stage II to III rectal cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2023 who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation in Commission on Cancer–accredited hospitals participating in the NCDB across the US were included.
Exposure
Age, year of diagnosis, and treatment strategy (proctectomy vs nonsurgical management).
Main Outcomes and Measures
The primary outcome consisted of watch-and-wait rates, defined as excess nonsurgical management greater than baseline. To account for nonsurgical management unrelated to the decision for watch and wait, joinpoint regression estimated baseline rates of nonsurgical management and annual percentage changes. A secondary analysis examined associations of age and year with watch-and-wait rates using multivariable logistic regression.
Results
Among 101 001 patients with rectal cancer (median [IQR] age, 60 [51-69] years; 37 957 female [37.58%]), 84 324 underwent surgery and 16 677 did not. Baseline rates of nonsurgical management remained stable through 2014. Joinpoints occurred in 2014 and 2019, with annual percentage changes of −0.45% (95% CI, −2.26% to 0.78%;
Conclusions and Relevance
In this study, watch-and-wait rates increased across all age groups, with a marked acceleration after 2019 suggesting evidence-concordant adoption of the watch-and-wait approach. This underscores the need for careful patient selection, accurate clinical response assessment, and rigorous surveillance monitoring to ensure safe oncologic outcomes.