DOI: 10.1017/s0004972726102007 ISSN: 0004-9727

ON SPARSE HOLES AND A FINITE-FOLD PROBLEM OF NATHANSON CONCERNING MINIMAL ADDITIVE COMPLEMENTS

ĐẶNG VÕ PHÚC

Abstract

Let

W ⊆ Z $W\subseteq \mathbb Z$ upper W subset of or equal to double struck upper Z
be bounded below and normalised by
inf W = 1 $\inf W=1$ inf upper W equals 1
, and put
W ― = Z > 0 ∖ W $\overline W=\mathbb Z_{>0}\setminus W$ upper W overbar equals double struck upper Z Subscript greater than 0 Baseline minus upper W
. Nathanson asked whether infinite sets of integers admit minimal additive complements. Chen and Yang [‘On a problem of Nathanson related to minimal additive complements’, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 26 (2012), 1532–1536] proved that the two-sided case is positive and that sufficiently large consecutive gaps in
W ― $\overline W$ upper W overbar
force nonexistence in the one-sided case. Chen and Ding [‘On a problem of Nathanson on nonminimal additive complements’, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 114 , 6–13] isolated a sparse-hole condition under which no ordinary minimal complement exists. We prove a finite-fold version of this sparse-hole obstruction. For an integer
h ≥ 1 $h\geq 1$ h greater than or equals 1
, write
h C = C + ⋯ + C $hC=C+\cdots +C$ h upper C equals upper C plus midline horizontal ellipsis plus upper C
. We show that if
W ― $\overline W$ upper W overbar
contains a sequence
a 1 < a 2 < ⋯ $a_1<a_2<\cdots $ a 1 less than a 2 less than midline horizontal ellipsis
such that
a t + 1 − a t → ∞ $a_{t+1}-a_t\to \infty $ a Subscript t plus 1 Baseline minus a Subscript t Baseline right arrow infinity
and the four-neighbourhoods
( a t − 2 , a t + 2 ) $(a_{t-2},a_{t+2})$ left parenthesis a Subscript t minus 2 Baseline comma a Subscript t plus 2 Baseline right parenthesis
contain at most K elements of
W ― $\overline W$ upper W overbar
for all sufficiently large t , then there is no set
C ⊆ Z $C\subseteq \mathbb Z$ upper C subset of or equal to double struck upper Z
which is minimal subject to
h C + W = Z $hC+W=\mathbb Z$ h upper C plus upper W equals double struck upper Z
. This result recovers and broadens the Chen–Ding nonexistence theorem as the special case
h = 1 $h=1$ h equals 1
.