DOI: 10.1017/s0004972726102007 ISSN: 0004-9727
ON SPARSE HOLES AND A FINITE-FOLD PROBLEM OF NATHANSON CONCERNING MINIMAL ADDITIVE COMPLEMENTS
ĐẶNG VÕ PHÚC Abstract
Let
W
⊆
Z
$W\subseteq \mathbb Z$
upper W subset of or equal to double struck upper Z
be bounded below and normalised by
inf
W
=
1
$\inf W=1$
inf upper W equals 1
, and put
W
―
=
Z
>
0
∖
W
$\overline W=\mathbb Z_{>0}\setminus W$
upper W overbar equals double struck upper Z Subscript greater than 0 Baseline minus upper W
. Nathanson asked whether infinite sets of integers admit minimal additive complements. Chen and Yang [‘On a problem of Nathanson related to minimal additive complements’,
SIAM J. Discrete Math.
26
(2012), 1532–1536] proved that the two-sided case is positive and that sufficiently large consecutive gaps in
W
―
$\overline W$
upper W overbar
force nonexistence in the one-sided case. Chen and Ding [‘On a problem of Nathanson on nonminimal additive complements’,
Bull. Aust. Math. Soc.
114
, 6–13] isolated a sparse-hole condition under which no ordinary minimal complement exists. We prove a finite-fold version of this sparse-hole obstruction. For an integer
h
≥
1
$h\geq 1$
h greater than or equals 1
, write
h
C
=
C
+
⋯
+
C
$hC=C+\cdots +C$
h upper C equals upper C plus midline horizontal ellipsis plus upper C
. We show that if
W
―
$\overline W$
upper W overbar
contains a sequence
a
1
<
a
2
<
⋯
$a_1<a_2<\cdots $
a 1 less than a 2 less than midline horizontal ellipsis
such that
a
t
+
1
−
a
t
→
∞
$a_{t+1}-a_t\to \infty $
a Subscript t plus 1 Baseline minus a Subscript t Baseline right arrow infinity
and the four-neighbourhoods
(
a
t
−
2
,
a
t
+
2
)
$(a_{t-2},a_{t+2})$
left parenthesis a Subscript t minus 2 Baseline comma a Subscript t plus 2 Baseline right parenthesis
contain at most
K
elements of
W
―
$\overline W$
upper W overbar
for all sufficiently large
t
, then there is no set
C
⊆
Z
$C\subseteq \mathbb Z$
upper C subset of or equal to double struck upper Z
which is minimal subject to
h
C
+
W
=
Z
$hC+W=\mathbb Z$
h upper C plus upper W equals double struck upper Z
. This result recovers and broadens the Chen–Ding nonexistence theorem as the special case
h
=
1
$h=1$
h equals 1
.