Olympics and the Cold War
Erin RedihanSummary
The onset of the Cold War following World War II created heightened interest in the Olympics. The Games soon became a venue for proxy battles between the Soviet Union and the United States. Both countries viewed the Olympics as a space where they could demonstrate the supremacy of their respective way of life without the nuclear threat that loomed over their more overtly political entanglements. The Olympic movement benefited from the superpower dynamic, as media outlets increased their coverage of the Olympics well outside their quadrennial two-week competition slates. By the 1980s, television networks were paying exorbitant broadcasting fees to the International Olympic Committee (IOC), as the Games were shown on six continents to a global audience of more than one billion people. Meanwhile, spectators were treated to enthralling contests like the 1980 Miracle on Ice, which saw the U.S. men’s hockey team upset the heavily favored Soviet team en route to winning the gold medal.
Yet this heightened interest also brought a highly political dynamic that challenged the IOC’s stated apolitical stance. Some of the issues that arose during the Cold War were questions regarding amateurism and its place in the Games, the complications regarding the postwar division of Germany, doping, and the boycotts that the United States and the Soviet Union staged in 1980 and 1984, respectively. As the Cold War ended and the Soviet Union dissolved, these political overtones were replaced by new issues within the Olympic movement, including the challenges posed by doping and the growing costs of hosting the Games. While the end of the Cold War was celebrated and many looked forward to future Games not marred by politics, there was also a sense of uncertainty surrounding the futures of now-former Soviet athletes whose lives and training were upended by the dissolution of their country.