Nudging Hard-to-Reach Populations Toward Spanish Colorectal Cancer Screening (JA PreventNCD study)
A Molina-Barceló, E Pérez-Sanz, P Romeo-Cervera, I Iturbe-Ormaeche, D Jiménez-Gómez, S Castán-Cameo, M Besó, M Vanaclocha-EspíAbstract
Introduction
Men over 60 are the least likely to participate in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme of the Valencia Community (CRCSP-VC). This study assesses three invitation-based behavioural nudges of increasing intensity to boost screening participation among never-screened men over 60 (hard-to-reach population).
Methods
A randomized controlled trial within the CRCSP-VC (Spain, Feb–Sep 2025) targeting never-screened men over 60 from the screening-eligible population, randomly assigned to one control and three intervention groups. The control group (n = 1,600) received the usual invitation (letter plus pre-paid card to accept the invitation; if accepted, the screening test was mailed home); Intervention groups (I) received escalating nudges: I1 (n = 1,600), usual invitation plus a modified letter using behavioural change messages; I2 (n = 1,600), I1 plus choice of pre-paid card or SMS to accept; I3 (n = 1,200), I1 plus direct home delivery of the screening test. Descriptive and multivariate (logit CI95%) analysis of the outcome variable (participation in CRCSP-VC), by region, age and socio-economic status (SES) (Q1=best to Q4=worst). Randomised Control Trial Registry: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN52248153. Ethics Committee approval (20241220/03/E).
Results
Participation rates were 5.4% (control group), 6.5% (I1), 7.7% (I2), and 19.7% (I3). Compared to controls, adjusted ORs were: I1 (OR1.20; CI 0.73-1.97); I2 (OR1.53; CI 0.94-2.50); and I3 (OR 4.30; CI 2.67-6.95). Participation increases in I3 vs control group in all SES levels (p < 0.05): (Q1: 4.2% vs 19.1%; Q2: 6.3% vs 22.0%; Q3: 1.7%-16.1%; Q4: 8.9% vs 20.8%).
Conclusions
Nudge intensity strongly predicts screening uptake. Directly mailing the screening test to participantśhome produced a four-fold participation increase, with consistent gains across all socioeconomic groups, suggesting this strategy can meaningfully reduce screening inequalities in hard-to-reach populations.
Key messages
• Participation rates increase significantly when the screening test is included directly with the invitation letter.
• Sending the screening test directly with the invitation letter reduces screening inequalities in hard-to-reach populations.