Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in rectal cancer (CHINOREC): A prospective randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical trial.
Johannes Laengle, Irene Kuehrer, Askin Kulu, Julijan Kabiljo, Daphni Ammon, Rebecca Zirnbauer, Anton Stift, Friedrich Herbst, Bernhard Dauser, Matthias Monschein, Peter Razek, Matthias Biebl, Hans Geinitz, Wolfgang Hulla, Leonhard Muellauer, Joachim Widder, Clemens Bittermann, Friedrich Laengle, Rainer Schmid, Michael M Bergmann,139
Background:
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) seem only effective in a primed tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to induce an immunogenic cell death (ICD) and thereby restores the susceptibility to ICI. This study evaluates the safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with concomitant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) in curative rectal cancer (RC) patients.
Methods:
The CHINOREC study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04124601) is a prospective, randomized (ratio 50:30), open-label, multicenter, phase II investigator-initiated trial (IIT). Patients with RC received neoadjuvant CRT (50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions with concurrent capecitabine 1650 mg/m
2
/d) alone or in combination with IPI (1 mg/kg IV at day 7), following 3 cycles of NIVO (3 mg/kg IV Q2W, starting on day 14). Surgical resection was performed 10-12 weeks post CRT. The primary endpoint was surgical safety and feasibility (Clavien-Dindo Classification) of neoadjuvant CRT with sequential IPI and NIVO following surgical resection. Secondary outcome was complete response rate (clinical and pathological).
Results:
Between June 2020 and November 2023, 145 patients were screened and 80 randomly assigned to CRT (n=30) or CRT+IPI/NIVO (n=50). The primary endpoint (any surgical complication) did not differ between the 2 groups (78% vs. 77%). The reoperation rate (≥Grade IIIb) was comparable low in both groups (8% vs. 7%). No new safety signals were identified. The rate of major pathological response (MPR) and complete response (CR) was also comparable high in both arms (38% vs. 37% and 30% vs. 22%, respectively).
Conclusions:
Neoadjuvant IPI/NIVO can be safely applied concomitant with CRT in patients with RC, as it does not increase the rate of reoperation or surgical complications. The validity of the encouraging CR rate needs to be elucidated over time. Further translational analyses will elucidate mechanistic insight regarding improved fraction, dosing and timing of CRT and ICI.