Multimodal Analysis of Aggressive Multifocal Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Associated with a Germline COL6A3 Truncating Variant: A Case Report
Mircea Negrutiu, Stefan Cristian Vesa, Bogdan Florea, Diana Miclea, Razvan Bucur, Adrian Baican, Monica Focșan, Sorina DanescuBackground: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is commonly regarded as a sporadic malignancy primarily driven by ultraviolet exposure. However, the occurrence of multiple, aggressive tumors at a relatively young age suggests the presence of underlying genetic susceptibility. The role of germline variants affecting extracellular matrix organization, pigmentation pathways, and tumor metabolism in aggressive cSCC remains incompletely understood. Case Presentation: We describe a 53-year-old patient with a long-standing history of multiple aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas involving the scalp and facial regions, characterized by recurrent and multifocal disease. A comprehensive diagnostic approach was undertaken, including histopathological examination, fluorescence confocal microscopy, high-frequency cutaneous ultrasound, and genetic analysis using whole-exome sequencing (WES). Results: Histopathology confirmed high-risk features consistent with aggressive cSCC. Cutaneous ultrasound and fluorescence confocal microscopy provided complementary, non-invasive insights into tumor depth, architecture, and invasive patterns. Whole-exome sequencing identified a heterozygous truncating variant in COL6A3 (NM_004369.4:c.5645C>A, p.Ser1882Ter), classified as likely pathogenic according to ACMG criteria. Additionally, two heterozygous variants of uncertain significance were detected in TYR (NM_000372.5:c.1569C>A, p.Ser523Arg) and FH (NM_000143.4:c.1237-5_1237-4insTCTCCCTCCCTC). Although individually inconclusive, the combined germline genetic background may have contributed to the patient’s aggressive and multifocal cutaneous phenotype. Discussion: This case report supports a potential role of extracellular matrix remodeling, pigmentation-related susceptibility, and metabolic dysregulation in cutaneous carcinogenesis and tumor aggressiveness. This case illustrates how integrating WES with advanced non-invasive imaging techniques can enhance the understanding of biologically aggressive cSCC. Conclusions: This report highlights a unique case of multifocal aggressive cSCC characterized by a distinct germline genetic profile identified by WES and multimodal imaging assessment. Comprehensive molecular and imaging evaluation may be beneficial in selected patients with atypical or aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, with implications for personalized surveillance and management.