DOI: 10.3390/jcs10100517 ISSN: 2504-477X

Multi-Objective Comparative Analysis of High-Strength Steel–Concrete Composite Columns

Jéssica Salomão Lourenção, Moacir Kripka, Víctor Yepes, Élcio Cassimiro Alves

Steel–concrete composite tubular columns have become increasingly attractive for sustainable structural applications due to their high load-carrying capacity and efficient material utilization. However, optimizing their structural performance while simultaneously minimizing embodied carbon emissions and material cost remains a challenging multi-objective problem. This study presents a comprehensive optimization framework for circular, rectangular, and square composite tubular columns composed of high-strength materials, and using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) algorithms. The multi-objective optimization simultaneously maximizes axial load capacity while minimizing embodied CO2 emissions, considering both sections with (WR) and without (WoR) additional longitudinal reinforcement, enabling the identification of optimal trade-offs between structural performance and environmental impact. Design variables include the cross-sectional dimensions, concrete compressive strength, steel yield strength, and reinforcement configuration. The resulting Pareto-optimal solutions are further evaluated using a multi-criteria decision-making approach based on Minkowski Metrics combined with Entropy Theory to identify the best overall compromise solution. The numerical results demonstrate that the use of high-strength materials can reduce embodied CO2 emissions by up to 16% in the analyzed cases. The implemented load-bearing capacity formulation was also validated against experimental results, yielding a mean Nexp/NNBR16239 ratio of 1.01 for the six specimens analyzed. The multi-objective formulation associated with Minkowski metrics produces a robust tool for determining the best solutions in general, as well as the best solutions related to the maximum load that the columns can support. Finally, for both the single-objective and multi-objective problem analyses, increasing the slenderness of the columns resulted in more costly solutions, both economically and environmentally.