Moving toward a finer-grained analysis and deeper explanation in a generative approach to L2 grammars

Abstract

This chapter argues that generative approaches to second language acquisition (GenSLA) should move beyond broad descriptive generalizations toward finer-grained analyses and deeper explanation. Drawing on the distinction between description and explanation, as well as different levels of explanation, we critically evaluate influential hypotheses in GenSLA, including the Bottleneck Hypothesis, the Interface Hypothesis, the Fluctuation Hypothesis, and the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis. While these proposals have contributed valuable descriptive insights, they often fail to specify underlying mechanisms or to generate sufficiently constrained, falsifiable predictions. Building on recent developments in the Minimalist Program, the chapter demonstrates how more analytically refined approaches can yield novel empirical predictions and principled explanations of L2 morphosyntactic phenomena. Through detailed discussion of recent studies and alternative explanatory proposals, the chapter highlights the importance of theory-driven research in uncovering the architecture of interlanguage grammars and clarifying the role of Universal Grammar in L2 development.