DOI: 10.71133/anatphar.2001143 ISSN: 2980-0463
Molecular Docking Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Phytochemical Compounds Against Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Enzymes in Alzheimer's Disease
Sevde Nur Yılmaz, Şeyma Yaşar Background: Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) regulate cholinergic neurotransmission and remain relevant targets for symptomatic treatment and ligand discovery in Alzheimer's disease. This study comparatively screened 16 phytochemicals from six medicinal plants against human AChE and BChE. Methods: Human AChE (PDB ID: 4EY7) and BChE (PDB ID: 6ESY) structures were prepared in AutoDockTools. Docking was conducted in AutoDock 4.2 using the Lamarckian genetic algorithm, 100 independent runs, and target-specific grids centred on the crystallographic binding pockets. Donepezil and galantamine were used as pharmacological comparators for AChE and BChE, respectively. Predicted physicochemical and drug-likeness properties were assessed with SwissADME. Results: Asiatic acid showed the most favourable predicted binding energy for AChE (−11.79 kcal/mol), close to donepezil (−11.65 kcal/mol). Withanolide A ranked first for BChE (−10.06 kcal/mol), followed by asiatic acid (−9.65 kcal/mol), madecassic acid (−9.12 kcal/mol), and asiaticoside (−9.08 kcal/mol), compared with galantamine (−6.74 kcal/mol). Interaction mapping suggested that asiatic acid occupied the catalytic gorge of both enzymes and formed hydrogen-bond, aromatic, and hydrophobic contacts with residues surrounding the binding pockets. Most compounds met Lipinski criteria; however, several highly ranked ligands were predicted not to cross the blood–brain barrier. Conclusions: The docking results identify asiatic acid, withanolide A, rosmarinic acid, and madecassic acid as candidates for experimental cholinesterase testing. Because docking scores do not establish biochemical inhibition or clinical efficacy, enzyme assays, selectivity testing, pharmacokinetic studies, and molecular-dynamics validation are required
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca02008 2026
Proximal Smoothness and the Lower-C
2
Property F. H. Clarke, R. J. Stern, P. R. Wolenski
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca13044 2026
Characterizations of Prox-Regular Sets in Uniformly Convex Banach Spaces Frédéric Bernard, Lionel Thibault, Nadia Zlateva
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca15047 2026
Brøndsted-Rockafellar Property and Maximality of Monotone Operators Representable by Convex Functions in Non-Reflexive Banach Spaces Maicon Marques Alves, Benar Fux Svaiter
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca16027 2026
Proximal Smoothness and the Exterior Sphere Condition Chadi Nour, Ron J. Stern, Jean Takche
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca16053 2026
A New Old Class of Maximal Monotone Operators Maicon Marques Alves, Benar Fux Svaiter
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca13045 2026
Maximal Monotonicity via Convex Analysis Jonathan Borwein
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca08009 2026
Variational Inequalities and Regularity Properties of Closed Sets in Hilbert Spaces Giovanni Colombo, Vladimir V. Goncharov
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca17060 2026
Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions for Non-Autonomous Complementarity Dynamical Systems Bernard Brogliato, Lionel Thibault
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca01001 2026
Variational Sum of Monotone Operators H. Attouch, J.-B. Baillon, M. Théra
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca22017 2026
Weak Convexity of Sets and Functions in a Banach Space Grigorii E. Ivanov