DOI: 10.1177/26350254261452269 ISSN: 2635-0254

Minimally Invasive Fixation of a Distal Fibula Fracture With an Intramedullary Nail

Jothi Murali-Larson

Background:

Advantages of using an intramedullary (IM) nail over a lateral plate for fixation of distal fibula fractures include the ability to allow for earlier weightbearing and return to sport, smaller incisions, and decreased hardware prominence. When comparing a fibular nail with an IM screw, the nail allows for syndesmosis fixation through the device and imparts rotational stability. Long-term studies support the viability and clinical outcomes of using an IM nail. In this technique video, a case is presented to illustrate the use of an IM nail for fixation of a distal fibula fracture.

Indications:

Distal fibula fractures should be treated operatively in the following cases: open fractures, bimalleolar fractures, or lateral malleolar fractures with medial clear space widening, displacement >3 mm, or decreased tib-fib overlap, increased talocrural angle, any talar displacement, fracture-dislocation, or nonunion. When treating these fractures operatively, it is crucial to get an anatomic reduction, as this will lead to a satisfactory outcome. By restoring the anatomy, the talar shift is decreased, and a normal tibiotalar contact area is approached.

Technique Description:

Percutaneous incisions are made around the fracture to place a clamp and hold anatomic reduction. Once reduced, a small incision is made 1cm distal to the fibular tip and in line with its axis. The start point is checked with the K-wire on anteroposterior and lateral views. An opening reamer is used, followed by a flexible guidewire and then a proximal reamer. Talons are deployed once the appropriate position is confirmed, and interlocking screws are placed through the guide. Syndesmosis fixation is added if necessary.

Results:

The success rate for achieving good outcomes is high at 90%. Patients should be counseled that their braking time while driving is normal at around 9 weeks and that overall recovery is about 2 years.

Discussion/Conclusion:

This technique should not be used if the 6.2-mm opening reamer will breach the cortex, and should not be used if a plate will provide superior fixation. Like with any nailing procedure, obtaining and maintaining the reduction is paramount. A proper start point is critical for optimal fixation.

The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

More from our Archive