DOI: 10.1177/10507256261474364 ISSN: 1050-7256

Micro-Costing Analysis of Thyroid Radiofrequency Ablation Compared with Hemithyroidectomy in Outpatient and Inpatient Settings

Harrison Gao, David Forner, Ben B. Levy, Pabiththa Kamalraj, Roshan Puri, Kevin M. Higgins, Justine Philteos, Antoine Eskander

Background:

Thyroid radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment for thyroid nodules. However, the health system costs of thyroid RFA are not well defined in the current literature. As its use expands, the objective of this study was to conduct a micro-costing analysis comparing RFA and hemithyroidectomy in outpatient and inpatient settings.

Methods:

A retrospective micro-costing analysis of 112 hemithyroidectomies and 42 thyroid RFAs was performed between January 2023 and May 2025 at two tertiary hospitals in Toronto, Canada. Costs were calculated in 2025 Canadian Dollars from the perspective of a publicly funded, single-payer health care system using a bottom-up approach across a one-year patient care cycle from initial consultation to one year of follow-up. Deterministic one-way sensitivity analyses were performed to assess cost-equivalence thresholds and the impact of procedural volume, repeat ablation, and delayed future surgery.

Results:

The base-case cost of RFA was $3985.05 over a one-year care cycle, including initial consultation and follow-up. RFA procedure costs accounted for $3107.61 (78.0%), which were primarily driven by consumables and supplies ($2022.21, 50.7%). Mean hemithyroidectomy costs were $4730.48 for outpatient cases and $5739.39 for inpatient cases, with an overall mean cost of $5613.28 across a one-year care cycle. For all hemithyroidectomy cases, procedure costs were driven primarily by operating room facility fees ($2344.86, 41.8%), physician fees for the surgeon and anesthesiologist ($943.38, 16.8%), and laboratory and pathology services ($486.12, 8.7%). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that cost equivalence between RFA and outpatient hemithyroidectomy occurred when 13.3% of patients required delayed surgery and 18.7% required repeat RFA. For inpatient hemithyroidectomy, cost equivalence was reached when 31.3% required delayed surgery and 44.0% required repeat RFA.

Conclusions:

Over one year, the base-case cost for thyroid RFA was $1628.23 lower (29.0%) than the mean cost of all hemithyroidectomies. The cost savings of thyroid RFA are driven by eliminating the need for operating room and inpatient admission resources. Nodule regrowth requiring repeat ablation or delayed surgery is a critical factor that significantly affects the overall cost of RFA. Ultimately, proper patient selection, ablation technique, and evidence-informed implementation are needed to fully realize RFA’s clinical and economic benefits.

More from our Archive