Long-Term Wetland Resilience Monitoring Using Landsat Time Series and a LandTrendr–GWRF Framework in Northeast China
Ying Liu, Dianfan Guo, Pengfei Li, Yuqi Sun, Yuhong ZhangLong-term monitoring of wetland degradation, recovery, and spatial resilience requires methods that can jointly exploit multi-temporal remote sensing observations and spatially heterogeneous environmental information. This study develops an intelligent remote sensing framework for monitoring the disturbance–recovery dynamics and spatial resilience of typical wetland landscapes in Northeast China by coupling Landsat-based Detection of Trends in Disturbance and Recovery (LandTrendr) with geographically weighted random forest (GWRF). Annual wetland landscape state sequences for 2000–2022 are constructed from multi-temporal Landsat observations and associated geospatial variables. LandTrendr time-series segmentation is used to identify disturbance timing, disturbance magnitude, recovery rate, and recovery duration, thereby converting long-term wetland change trajectories into quantitative indicators of degradation and recovery. At the GIS grid scale, remotely sensed vegetation and wetness indicators are integrated with wetland patch structure, hydrological conditions, topography, land-cover change, and anthropogenic pressure. GWRF then models local nonlinear relationships under spatial-distance weighting to generate a spatially explicit wetland resilience index and reveal geographically varying dominant controls. The LandTrendr–GWRF model achieved an R2 of 0.872, an RMSE of 0.057, and an MAE of 0.039, outperforming RF, GWR, XGBoost, and standalone GWRF benchmarks. The mean wetland resilience index was 0.641, with low-, medium-, and high-resilience areas accounting for 27.86%, 44.37%, and 27.77% of the study area, respectively. Significant spatial clustering was detected (Moran’s I = 0.421, Z = 6.92, p = 0.001). Hydrological regulation, landscape connectivity, fragmentation constraint, and anthropogenic disturbance pressure emerged as the four dominant spatial response types. High-resilience cells formed contiguous clusters where hydrological recharge and landscape connectivity were strong, while low-resilience cells clustered where fragmentation and construction pressure were concentrated. Disturbance magnitude and recovery duration differed markedly among the four response types, with connectivity-dominated cells returning to the pre-disturbance state within 4.4 years and anthropogenic pressure-dominated cells requiring 11.7 years. The proposed framework extends wetland remote sensing from static condition mapping toward process-oriented monitoring of degradation, recovery, connectivity, and resilience, providing a practical approach for long-term wetland restoration assessment and spatial management.