DOI: 10.3390/metabo16080589 ISSN: 2218-1989

Lipidomic Profiling Reveals Distinct Molecular Signatures Across Clinical Subtypes of Myasthenia Gravis

Yufei Song, Die Dai, Min Cao, Rongrong Li, Jiaru Liu, Min Zhang, Yuqing Chen, Ruimin Tian, Peiyu Liu, Xiaoting Peng, Jiayi Huang, Qilin Fang, Beibei Dong, Biyi Pang, Liang Liu

Background/Objectives: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an immune-mediated neuromuscular disorder for which antibody-based assays have limited sensitivity, particularly in double-seronegative MG (dsNMG), highlighting the need for complementary biomarkers. Given their roles in immune regulation, membrane integrity, and metabolic stress responses, lipids represent promising candidates for biomarker discovery. Methods: We designed a prospective case–control study and systematically stratified 68 patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) according to clinical classification and autoantibody status. Using LC–MS/MS, we quantified 824 lipids in 136 serum samples collected from these patients and 68 healthy controls. The analyzed subtypes included ocular MG (OMG), generalized MG (GMG), acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive MG (AChR-MG), and dsNMG. Differential lipid analysis, correlation network construction, KEGG pathway enrichment, and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Diagnostic and subtype prediction models were developed using LASSO with 10 × 10 repeated cross-validation and interpreted using Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. A longitudinal follow-up analysis was conducted to assess dynamic associations between lipid signatures and disease activity. Results: In total, 240 lipids were significantly altered in MG compared with controls. Lipids distinguishing GMG from OMG were enriched in ether lipid metabolism, necroptosis, and sphingolipid signaling pathways. AChR-MG and dsNMG shared lipid networks related to membrane remodeling and signaling regulation, whereas dsNMG exhibited marked elevations in acylcarnitines and bile acid-related metabolites, potentially reflecting a distinct phenotype characterized by altered energy metabolism. The lipid-based model achieved an AUC of 0.917 for distinguishing MG from controls, and AUCs of 0.77 and 0.71 for differentiating AChR-MG from dsNMG and GMG from OMG, respectively. Longitudinal analyses showed that SM(d18:1/23:0) and Cer(d24:1/18:0(2OH)) displayed dynamic changes consistent with disease activity. Conclusions: Serum lipidomics revealed subtype-specific metabolic features of MG, with stable disease-associated remodeling and dynamic sphingolipid changes potentially reflecting disease activity. By integrating systematic clinical and antibody-based subtype stratification with longitudinal follow-up, this study supports lipidomics as a complementary tool for precision diagnosis and disease stratification, particularly in antibody-negative dsNMG.

More from our Archive