DOI: 10.1161/jaha.124.036596 ISSN: 2047-9980
Left Ventricular 3‐Dimensional Global Longitudinal Strain Predicts All‐Cause Mortality in Patients With Heart Transplant
Shuangshuang Zhu, Chun Wu, Yiwei Zhang, Weihua Qiao, Nianguo Dong, Yuman Li, Mingxing Xie, Li Zhang
Background
The prognostic value of 3‐dimensional (3D)‐left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) in recipients of heart transplant (HT) reremains unknown. This study aimed to determine whether 3D‐LVGLS was the more powerful predictor of poor outcomes in recipients of HT compared with 2‐dimensional (2D)‐LVGLS.
Methods and Results
All consecutive adult patients who received HT and underwent at least 1 comprehensive 2D and 3D transthoracic echocardiographic examination for clinical surveillance were retrospectively enrolled. The end point was all‐cause mortality. Prognostic model performance was assessed according to the C‐statistic. The 3D‐LVGLS measurements were feasible in 294 of 342 patients with HT (86%). The median follow‐up time was 53 months, and 44 HT redied. Receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that the area under the curve for predicting all‐cause mortality was greater for 3D‐LVGLS than 2D‐LVGLS (0.77 versus 0.67,
P
=0.012). When HT stratified patients with HT into tertiles according to 3D‐LVGLS values, patients with lower 3D‐LVGLS had worse outcome (
P
<0.001). The multivariable Cox analysis showed that the model with 3D‐LVGLS (hazard ratio [HR],1.44 [95% CI,1.24–1.68];
P
<0.001; C‐statistic=0.814) was better in predicting death than the model with 2D‐LVGLS (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.06–1.32];
P
=0.002; C‐statistic=0.772). The best cutoff value of 3D‐LVGLS for detecting all‐cause mortality was −16.1%, with a sensitivity of 63.6% and a specificity of 84.0%.
Conclusions
The 3D‐LVGLS was a powerful predictor of all‐cause mortality in patients receiving HT and provided greater prognostic value than 2D‐LVGLS. Our study highlighted the potential of evaluating 3D‐LVGLS for risk stratification in recipients of HT.
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.1093/mollus/eyae048 2024
Conservation ecology of land snails: a synthesis for Estonia Liina Remm, Maarja Vaikre, Merike Linnamägi, Asko Lõhmus
-
DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae158 2024
Conducting industry informant interviews to advance healthy food retail initiatives: challenges, opportunities, and lessons Angela Y Zhang, Cerra C Antonacci, Melissa N Laska, Megan R Winkler
-
DOI: 10.4103/jvbd.jvbd_2_24 2024
Canine leishmaniasis in Maghreb countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis Sabrina Baaziz, Rima Sadeddine, Faycal Zeroual, Ahmed Benakhla, Souad Righi
-
DOI: 10.4103/jvbd.bd_50_24 2024
Diversity of mosquito natural enemies and their feeding efficacy on Aedes vectors Dinithi Shyamalee Dissanayake, Chandana Dammika Wijekoon, Hemantha Wegiriya
-
DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000001079 2024
Does climate change threaten delivery of HIV care in resource-limited settings? Kingsley Stephen Orievulu, Matylda Buczkowska, Collins C. Iwuji
-
DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000001047 2024
Exploring the management of recurrent angioedema caused by different mechanisms Ilaria Mormile, Chiara Suffritti, Maria Bova
-
DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000001022 2024
Chronic rhinosinusitis and asthma: epidemiology, pathophysiology, morbidity, treatment Marlene M. Speth, David T. Liu, Gerold Besser, Ahmad R. Sedaghat
-
DOI: 10.1097/mco.0000000000001094 2024
Critical care nutrition: a Bayesian re-analysis of trial data Natalia Alejandra Angeloni, Federico Angriman, Neill K.J. Adhikari
-
DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000001027 2024
Recent developments in olfactory neuroblastoma research Anthony Ghanem, John B. Finlay, David W. Jang, Bradley J. Goldstein, Ralph Abi Hachem
-
DOI: 10.1097/mol.0000000000000965 2024
Preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: does novel proteomics reveal immunological possible candidate biomarkers? Marie Winther, Morten Hanefeld Dziegiel, Steffen Ullitz Thorsen