DOI: 10.3390/electronics15163559 ISSN: 2079-9292

Layered Inertial-Terrain-Visual Navigation for UAVs Under GNSS-Denied Conditions: A Case Study over the Tibetan Plateau

Zhi Liu, Yong Xian, Leliang Ren, Ming Wang, Liying Qian

A UAV operating without GNSS faces unbounded inertial drift. A layered navigation architecture is evaluated in which terrain contour matching (TERCOM) provides periodic position corrections and satellite-image scene matching adds a condition-dependent precision layer. The architecture is examined through a single-trajectory simulation over a 1° × 1° ASTER GDEM V2 tile (N31E081, Tibetan Plateau, 4555–6468 m elevation, 16.1 mean slope) representing a one-hour flight (127 km, 35.2 m/s). The simulation models GNSS loss with idealised sensor behaviour: IMU error is described by a Gauss–Markov model without temperature dependence, and the radar altimeter is represented with additive Gaussian noise. Under these conditions, TERCOM reduced RMS position error from 1467 m to 317 m (78.4% reduction); with ideal noise-free scene-matching registration added, RMS further decreased to 103 m (a best-case estimate). The idealised Cramér–Rao lower bound already incorporates the 5 m radar-altimeter and 20 m DEM noise terms (it is therefore not a noise-free value) at the flight mean slope of 16.1°; averaging this local bound over the full trajectory—where near-flat segments inflate it—gives the tile-averaged CRLB of ≈150 m. The remaining gap between the realised TERCOM RMS (317 m) and this realistic bound is attributed to residual INS drift during profile collection, DEM interpolation error, and low-entropy terrain segments; a quantitative decomposition of these factors is provided in this paper. Results are based on a single noise realisation and a single trajectory; they characterise the specific simulation scenario rather than the architecture’s general performance. The altitude-error decomposition argument—that TERCOM’s sensitivity depends primarily on short-term dynamic altitude drift rather than the accumulated systematic error—is developed specifically for the normalised cross-correlation (NCC) metric and requires mean-centring of the terrain profile for generalisation to other correlation metrics.

More from our Archive