DOI: 10.33631/sabd.1853135 ISSN: 2792-0542
Is Routine Urine Culture Necessary Before Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Under Current Prophylaxis and Antisepsis Practices? A Retrospective Cohort Study
Ahmet Yıldırım Balık, Emre Ediz, Burak Ayvacık, Arda Taşkın Taşkıran, Ekrem Başaran, Dursun Baba, Muhammet Ali Kayıkçı Aim: To evaluate the effect of routine urine culture screening before prostate biopsy on post-procedural infectious complications in patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB) performed under cephalosporin-based prophylaxis and modern antisepsis protocols.Material and Methods: 295 consecutive patients who underwent TRUS-PB in our clinic between January 2024 and June 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=130), patients who did not have a urine culture in the last month, and Group 2 (n=165), patients who did. All patients received cephalosporin prophylaxis, rectal povidone-iodine cleaning during the procedure, and formalin disinfection of the needle tip after each core. Data were recorded retrospectively from the hospital information management system and patient files. Post-biopsy infectious complications were recorded.Results: No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding serum PSA levels (p=0.251), total number of cores (p=0.200), and diabetes mellitus rates (p=0.345). The total infection rate was 2.03% (n=6); it was 2.31% (n=3) in Group 1 and 1.82% (n=3) in Group 2 (p=1.000). Post-biopsy urine culture positivity was detected in a total of 3 patients (1.02%); it was 0.77% (n=1) in Group 1 and 1.21% (n=2) in Group 2 (p=1.000). No statistical difference was found between the groups in terms of hospitalization rates due to infection (Group 1: 1.54% vs. Group 2: 1.21%) (p=1.000). Sepsis did not develop in either group during the study period.Conclusion: Routine urine culture screening and sterilization follow-up may not be routinely necessary in asymptomatic patients before prostate biopsy when current prophylaxis and antisepsis rules are followed. However, these results need to be supported by larger and prospective randomized studies.
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca02008 2026
Proximal Smoothness and the Lower-C
2
Property F. H. Clarke, R. J. Stern, P. R. Wolenski
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca13044 2026
Characterizations of Prox-Regular Sets in Uniformly Convex Banach Spaces Frédéric Bernard, Lionel Thibault, Nadia Zlateva
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca15047 2026
Brøndsted-Rockafellar Property and Maximality of Monotone Operators Representable by Convex Functions in Non-Reflexive Banach Spaces Maicon Marques Alves, Benar Fux Svaiter
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca16027 2026
Proximal Smoothness and the Exterior Sphere Condition Chadi Nour, Ron J. Stern, Jean Takche
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca16053 2026
A New Old Class of Maximal Monotone Operators Maicon Marques Alves, Benar Fux Svaiter
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca13045 2026
Maximal Monotonicity via Convex Analysis Jonathan Borwein
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca08009 2026
Variational Inequalities and Regularity Properties of Closed Sets in Hilbert Spaces Giovanni Colombo, Vladimir V. Goncharov
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca17060 2026
Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions for Non-Autonomous Complementarity Dynamical Systems Bernard Brogliato, Lionel Thibault
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca01001 2026
Variational Sum of Monotone Operators H. Attouch, J.-B. Baillon, M. Théra
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca22017 2026
Weak Convexity of Sets and Functions in a Banach Space Grigorii E. Ivanov