RFC1 Repeat Expansions in Chronic Idiopathic Axonal Polyneuropathy: Prevalence, Phenotype, and Diagnostic Implications
Vicente Gajate‐García, María Fenollar‐Cortés, Lucía Galán, Raluca Oancea‐Ionescu, Antonio Guerrero‐Solá, Alejandro HorgaABSTRACT
Background and Aims
Chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP) accounts for approximately 20%–30% of adult‐onset axonal polyneuropathies. Pathogenic RFC1 repeat expansions have emerged as a frequent cause of idiopathic sensory neuropathy, but their recognition in routine clinical practice may be challenging, particularly in the presence of potentially confounding comorbidities. We aimed to determine the prevalence of pathogenic RFC1 repeat expansions in a well‐defined CIAP cohort, characterize the associated clinical and electrophysiological phenotype, and evaluate whether coexisting well‐controlled diabetes mellitus (DM) or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) may hinder recognition of RFC1 ‐related neuropathy.
Methods
We performed a retrospective observational study of adult patients with CIAP followed at a tertiary neuromuscular unit. All patients underwent RFC1 genetic testing. Clinical and electrophysiological features were compared between RFC1+ and RFC1 − patients in the full cohort and after exclusion of patients with DM or MGUS.
Results
Ninety patients met CIAP criteria and were analyzed. Twenty‐four (27%) carried biallelic pathogenic AAGGG repeat expansions in RFC1 , of whom 6 (25%) had coexisting DM or MGUS. Compared with RFC1 − patients, RFC1+ individuals more frequently exhibited dysautonomic symptoms, unsteadiness, history of falls, need for walking support, chronic cough, impaired vibration sense in the upper limbs and up to the knees in the lower limbs, brisk upper‐limb reflexes, mild cerebellar signs, an abnormal head‐impulse test, and a positive Romberg's test. Most of these differences persisted after exclusion of DM or MGUS. Electrophysiological studies in RFC1 + patients showed widespread sensory nerve involvement, including the upper limbs, with relative motor sparing, whereas RFC1 − patients exhibited a more typical length‐dependent pattern.
Interpretation
Biallelic AAGGG repeat expansions in RFC1 were identified in 27% of patients with CIAP. Specific clinical and electrophysiological features may help distinguish RFC1 ‐related disease from other forms of CIAP and identify candidates for genetic testing, even in the presence of potentially confounding comorbidities such as well‐controlled DM or MGUS.