DOI: 10.1177/16094069261480525 ISSN: 1609-4069

Rasan-Rasan as Feminist Method: Gossip, Informal Talk, and Knowledge Production in Javanese Women’s Narratives

Dewi Candraningrum

This article introduces rasan-rasan, a Javanese practice of informal talk or gossip, as a feminist qualitative research method. In contrast to structured interviews, rasan-rasan allows women to share narratives without the performative filtering typical in formal research encounters. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with mothers in Nguter and Kendeng, Central Java, the study demonstrates how rasan-rasan functions as a relational epistemic practice: participants negotiate meaning collectively, voice dissent, and articulate experiences often hidden from conventional research methods. I explicitly reclaim “gossip” from its pejorative connotations, following feminist scholarship that positions informal talk as a legitimate site of knowledge production, relational truth-seeking, and epistemic resistance. Integrating feminist epistemology and gossip studies ( Adkins, 2002

; Besnier, 2009
; Dreby, 2009
), the article positions informal talk as a legitimate source of knowledge production and methodological innovation. The discussion highlights ethical and reflexive considerations, including emotional labor, researcher positionality, and cultural sensitivity. By documenting how rasan-rasan operates as a culturally embedded feminist method, this study contributes to expanding the repertoire of qualitative methodologies that honor Indigenous knowledge, relational storytelling, and the epistemic agency of women. Implications for global feminist research practices are discussed, emphasizing the potential of informal conversational ethnography to generate rich, authentic, and ethically grounded data.

More from our Archive