DOI: 10.1075/scl.128.10wec ISSN: 1388-0373
Over over again
Michelle WeckermannAbstract
Prepositions, particularly over , have been extensively studied in cognitive linguistics, including two influential approaches:
Lakoff’s (1987)
full-specification account and
Tyler and
Evans’ (2003)
principled polysemy account. Lakoff’s approach
represents all senses of
over
but has been criticized for
its sole reliance on introspection and fabricated examples. In contrast,
Tyler and Evans propose fewer senses, separating the semantics of a sense
from contextual influences; however, their approach still employs fabricated
examples. This study aims to build on these by using natural data from a
range of sources in order to identify the breadth of senses
over
can express. It identifies thirteen senses of
over
and shows that the preposition is primarily
spatial, with temporal and abstract senses less frequent by comparison.