Interpersonal Relationships: From Intimate Partnerships to Weak-Tie Relationships
Susan Sprecher, Terri Orbuch, Diane FelmleeSummary
Sociologists and scholars from related disciplines have contributed to a prolific and interdisciplinary science of relationships. This field began to expand dramatically in the 1980s, with a focus on topics such as marital instability and contextual influences. Sociologists and other relationship scientists have studied the wide array of relationships people have in their social networks, which range from an intimate partner to weak ties. People’s networks consist of concentric layers of members, beginning with the inner circle of five or fewer close friends, adult children, and parents and continuing through larger layers of increasingly distant ties. Relationships serve many functions and contribute to people’s health and well-being, whereas their absence has been identified as a major health risk and as leading to lower well-being. Close relationships are crucial for good health and well-being, but having a diverse network of close and weaker ties also is important. Several relationship processes—including self-disclosure, responsiveness, need fulfillment, and exchange—occur across a range of relationships and contribute to the quality of relationships and, hence, to better well-being. Self-disclosure, which is the revealing of one’s own notable personal information to the recipient, is an essential ingredient of relationship involvement, and it provides benefits for both relationships and the individuals in them. Responsiveness, in the form of responding to a partner’s need for feeling loved and to their minor bids for affection, also significantly affects relationship longevity and quality. Moreover, close relationships can help fill people’s primary needs for intimacy and affection; fulfillment of needs is linked to improved relationship satisfaction and commitment. All of these processes and other resources (money, favors, love, status) are exchanged in relationships, which leads relationships to be perceived to be more or less rewarding and more or less equitable; these perceptions affect the quality of the relationship. Relationships also exist in larger contexts and sociocultural environments and are influenced by cultural factors, historical trends, community social capital, and other social ties. In Western culture, personal independence tends to be a priority: More people live by themselves, birth rates are lower, and the age at first marriage is higher. People often count on a partner to meet their self-actualization needs in addition to their needs for love, which can place a burden on the relationship. On a societal level, communities differ in the extent to which they provide opportunities for people to form social connections, with some providing promising third places, such as parks, cafes, and museums, where they can gather and socialize, while others face constraints such as poverty and risky neighborhoods. Social networks represent an additional contextual factor that influences interpersonal relationships. Extensive research provides support for the social network effect, whereby support and approval from people’s friends and family aid in relationship development and longevity. Future work could benefit from additional attention to situational, developmental, and contextual factors and to interventions for couples. Given its broad theoretical and empirical lens, sociological work will be invaluable in moving the field forward.