Integrated Geochemical, Vegetation, and Risk Assessment of a Pb–Zn Slag Reprocessing Site in Southern Kazakhstan: Implications for Sustainable Remediation Prioritization

Reprocessing historical lead–zinc (Pb–Zn) slag offers a circular-economy pathway for secondary metal recovery, yet it can remobilize legacy contaminants where containment is inadequate, transferring risk to the surrounding land. Sustainable management of such sites requires frameworks that link contamination assessment to actionable remediation. We integrated ICP-OES geochemistry, native-plant biomonitoring, and US EPA RAGS-based risk modeling at an active Pb–Zn slag reprocessing site in Shymkent, Southern Kazakhstan. Twenty-four soil samples along four cardinal transects, two reference samples, and four composite plant samples (Centaurea pseudosquarrosa + Plantago lanceolata) were analyzed for ten metals by ICP-OES. UCC-referenced indices classified six metals as geoaccumulation Class 6 at most points (enrichment factors up to 90,871, confirming an exclusively anthropogenic origin). Peak concentrations reached 9350 mg·kg−1 Pb, 290 mg·kg−1 Cd, and 10,900 mg·kg−1 As—exceeding Kazakhstan MPC by 72×, 290×, and 5450×. Worst-case carcinogenic risk reached 4.3 × 10−3 (43× above the US EPA threshold), driven almost entirely by arsenic (93%); ecosystem risk (RCRtotal = 223) was dominated by cadmium (43%), arsenic (27%), and mercury (16%)—a disconnect between mass-based and toxicity-based prioritization. On this basis we propose a three-tier remediation framework (engineered containment, phytostabilization, monitored attenuation) that couples resource recovery with contamination control, is transferable to analogous Pb–Zn legacy sites, and supports sustainable land use, urban resilience, and responsible secondary-resource use.