DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14131835 ISSN: 2227-9032

Institutional Surveys and the Patient Feedback Mechanism in a Romanian Public Emergency Hospital: A Longitudinal Comparative Analysis, 2019–2024

Mihaela-Denisa Coman, Dan-Marius Coman, Petronela-Alice Grigorescu

Background/Objectives: Standardised institutional patient satisfaction surveys are the primary quality-monitoring tool in Romanian public hospitals, but their ability to capture the full range of patient experiences remains uncertain. This study quantifies the discrepancy between institutional patient satisfaction scores and an independent, unmediated national feedback instrument, the Patient Feedback Mechanism (MFP), at Targoviste County Emergency Hospital (SJUT) over a six-year period (2019–2024), and examines item-level MFP results across eight dimensions of the patient experience, including dimensions not captured by the institutional indicators routinely reported by SMCSP. Methods: A sequential design combined six years of institutional satisfaction data (2019–2024) from SJUT (N = 32,176 questionnaires) with item-level MFP results for the same period, covering eight questions on medical services, cleanliness, out-of-pocket medication costs, staff involvement, communication, recommendation intent, self-reported health outcome, and willingness to report requests for money from staff. Hypotheses were tested using two-proportion z-tests with Wilson confidence intervals, Mann–Kendall trend analysis, and Cohen’s h for effect sizes. Results: Institutional satisfaction remained consistently high (96.88–97.45%), while MFP satisfaction with medical services ranged from 70.7% to 88.9% across the same years, yielding gaps of 7.9 to 26.7 percentage points, significant in every year (p < 0.001; Cohen’s h ranging from 0.32 to 0.82). The gap did not follow a monotonic trend (Mann–Kendall p = 0.469); instead, it widened to a peak in 2021 and narrowed progressively through 2024. A parallel comparison between the Quality and Patient Safety Management Service (SMCSP) overall impression item (exceeding 99%) and the MFP recommendation item (69.9–76.3%) showed even larger gaps, of 23.3 to 29.6 percentage points. The MFP item on willingness to report requests for money from staff, which is not part of SMCSP’s reported institutional indicators, remained in a narrow 4.0–5.5% range between 2019 and 2023 with no significant trend (Mann–Kendall p = 0.82); a higher 2024 value (6.9%) coincides with a national redesign of this item and is not directly comparable to earlier years. Conclusions: Institutional surveys and an independent national feedback instrument offer structurally distinct perspectives on hospital performance, reflecting differences in administration rather than equivalent estimates of patient satisfaction. The discrepancy between sources is significant and persistent, though not monotonic, widening sharply during 2021 before narrowing. One item with no institutional equivalent documents a measurable, non-trivial proportion of patients willing to report informal payment requests every year, although the available data do not establish whether this proportion is rising over time. Systematic use of existing MFP data, already collected nationally, can complement institutional surveys at minimal additional cost, provided the two instruments are interpreted as structurally different rather than as alternative estimates of the same quantity.

More from our Archive