Insect monitoring without pitfalls: Seven steps for robust insect sensing systems
Jamie Alison, Luca Pegoraro, Jarrett Blair, Yuval Cohen, Birgen Haest, Jacob Idec, Jacob Kamminga, Jenna Lawson, Meng Li, Leandro Aparecido Do Nascimento, Charlotte L. Outhwaite, Benjamin Rutschmann, Maximilian Sittinger, Mariana Abarca, Tom August, Quentin Geissmann, Rob Guralnick, Guillaume Mougeot, Valentin Ștefan, Kim Bjerge, Mikkel Brydegaard, Toke Thomas Høye, Eva Knop, William Kunin, Moritz Lürig, David Roy, Asger Svenning, Roel van KlinkAbstract
Data shortages fuel controversy about an ongoing insect biodiversity crisis. Insects are immensely diverse and functionally critical for ecosystems, yet data on their trends remain patchy and biased. Sensors, ranging from camera traps and acoustic recorders to weather radar stations, are set to transform data collection in entomology. Meanwhile, AI models that extract biological information from sensors are improving at a startling rate.
Realising the potential of automated monitoring means progressing from proof‐of‐concept studies to scalable insect sensing systems. However, stakeholders face severe operational challenges when adopting a growing suite of sensors, models and protocols for insect surveillance. Deployment of devices is not well co‐ordinated, while the risks of relying on AI are overlooked or understated. To achieve monitoring goals, common pitfalls related to sensors and AI need to be exposed and avoided.
We trace a seven‐step path towards an effective transnational rollout of insect sensing systems. Step (1) reviews strengths, weaknesses and synergies across visual, acoustic, radar and photonic sensors; (2) confronts species determination—a key challenge for sensors and AI—suggesting how to improve identification and make use of uncertain data; (3) promotes creating and sharing standardised, labelled data, offering ecological insights and opportunities to train and evaluate AI.
Focussing on data processing and scalability, step (4) proposes using AI to complement other resources, both human and digital, given it is not always the best tool for the job; (5) highlights how and why AI models fail, calling for routine evaluations and shrewdness during model training; (6) aims to break barriers to wider uptake of technologies through knowledge sharing, affordable design principles and equitable computing infrastructures, and finally, (7) emphasises that any revolution in insect monitoring must be grounded in good sampling design, with established monitoring schemes at its core.
We set a trajectory for coordinated development of insect sensing systems, focussing not only on technical performance but also on integration with human expertise, case‐based evaluation and harmonisation with historical long‐term datasets. We address fundamental challenges of sensors and AI for biodiversity monitoring, producing recommendations that apply to all branches of the tree of life.