DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.184859.3 ISSN: 2046-1402
Innovation Ambidexterity, Regulatory Pressure, and Resource Orchestration Capability as Explanatory Factors of Organizational Agility: Evidence from Indonesian Hospitals
Edi Suyitno, Tantri Yanuar Rahmat Syah, Ediansyah ., Aziz Fajar Ariwibowo
Background Organizational agility is important for hospitals facing service complexity, regulatory demands, and environmental change. This study examined the associations of innovation ambidexterity, resource orchestration capability, and regulatory pressure with organizational agility in a purposively sampled Indonesian hospital context. Methods A cross-sectional organizational survey was analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in SmartPLS 4. The original interim extract included 81 records, of which one (R001, 5 January 2026) was a pre-survey test submission. The corrected primary analysis includes 80 eligible key-informant responses and retains the final 29-indicator reflective global measurement model. Bootstrap inference used 5,000 subsamples; the 44-indicator model and an N = 78 subset served as sensitivity checks. Results Innovation ambidexterity showed the largest positive standardized association with organizational agility (β = 0.440, t = 4.511, p < 0.001), followed by resource orchestration capability (β = 0.363, t = 2.869, p = 0.004) and regulatory pressure (β = 0.227, t = 2.958, p = 0.003). The three explanatory factors jointly accounted for 81.0% of the in-sample variance in agility (R
2
= 0.810). Measurement diagnostics require caution, particularly for RPR internal consistency and some Fornell–Larcker comparisons. Conclusions These findings describe positive explanatory associations within the analyzed hospital sample, not causal effects or verified out-of-sample prediction. The global innovation ambidexterity construct represents joint exploratory and exploitative indicator levels and does not directly test a balance between the two orientations.
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.1145/3845995 2026
A Survey of LLM-based Software Repair: Taxonomies, Design Paradigms, and Applications Boyang Yang, Zijian Cai, Fengling Liu, Bach Le, Lingming Zhang, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Yang Liu, Haoye Tian
-
DOI: 10.1108/jrim-02-2024-0074 2026
Cutting-edge research in social media and interactive marketing: a
review and research agenda James W Peltier, Andrew J Dahl, Lauren Drury, Tracy Khan
-
DOI: 10.1108/jkm-04-2021-0336 2026
Knowledge hiding – a systematic review and research
agenda Amitabh Anand, Florian Offergelt, Payal Anand
-
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20230448 2026
The Unequal Economic Consequences of Carbon Pricing Diego R. Känzig
-
DOI: 10.1017/awf.2026.10115 2026
Part 1: Assessment of upright restraint of broilers for head-only electrical stunning Troy J. Gibson, Georgina Limon, Shannon Campbell, Natalie Chancellor, Katharine A Fletcher, Paul Berry, Jeff Lines
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.86 2026
MadAgents Tilman Plehn, Daniel Schiller, Nikita Schmal
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.86-r2.0 2026
Codebase release 2.0 for MadAgents Tilman Plehn, Daniel Schiller, Nikita Schmal
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.85 2026
svPITE: A Python package for the state-vector-based probabilistic imaginary-time evolution algorithm Pascal Sievers, Satoshi Ejima
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.85-r1.1 2026
Codebase release 1.1 for svPITE Pascal Sievers, Satoshi Ejima
-
DOI: 10.1177/02611929261494117 2026
The World Medical Association’s
Declaration of Helsinki
and
Statement on Animal Use in Biomedical Research
: Why reliable and valid preclinical evidence and Natalie Anderson, Jane Kotzmann, Rachel Smith, Kathrin Herrmann