DOI: 10.47582/jompac.2025792 ISSN: 2717-7505
In vitro antileishmanial activity and selectivity profile of quinazolinone derivatives against Leishmania major
Baycan Mor Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro antileishmanial activity of five quinazolinone derivatives against Leishmania major (L. major) promastigotes and to determine their cytotoxicity toward human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and corresponding selectivity indices (SI).Methods: The quinazolinone derivatives (K1–K5) were tested against logarithmic-phase L. major promastigotes over a concentration range of 3.125–200 µM, with miltefosine used as the reference drug. Antileishmanial activity was assessed after 24 h using the cell viability detection kit-8 (CVDK-8). Cytotoxicity was evaluated in HUVECs, and half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were determined by nonlinear regression. SI was calculated as the ratio of the HUVEC IC50 to the L. major IC50.Results: All five quinazolinone derivatives exhibited concentration-dependent antileishmanial activity against L. major, with IC50 values ranging from 29.66 to 41.11 µM. Their HUVEC IC50 values ranged from 69.73 to 91.53 µM. Miltefosine showed greater antileishmanial activity (IC50=21.54 µM) but higher cytotoxicity toward HUVECs (IC50=9.93 µM). Accordingly, K1–K5 showed SI values ranging from 2.15 to 2.38, whereas the SI of miltefosine was 0.46.Conclusion: The five quinazolinone derivatives exhibited in vitro antileishmanial activity against L. major promastigotes and higher SI values than miltefosine under the present experimental conditions. However, the SI values of 2.15–2.38 indicate modest selectivity and should be interpreted cautiously. Further evaluation in intracellular amastigote models is required to determine whether the observed antileishmanial activity is maintained in a host-cell-associated system.
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.1145/3845995 2026
A Survey of LLM-based Software Repair: Taxonomies, Design Paradigms, and Applications Boyang Yang, Zijian Cai, Fengling Liu, Bach Le, Lingming Zhang, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Yang Liu, Haoye Tian
-
DOI: 10.1108/jrim-02-2024-0074 2026
Cutting-edge research in social media and interactive marketing: a
review and research agenda James W Peltier, Andrew J Dahl, Lauren Drury, Tracy Khan
-
DOI: 10.1108/jkm-04-2021-0336 2026
Knowledge hiding – a systematic review and research
agenda Amitabh Anand, Florian Offergelt, Payal Anand
-
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20230448 2026
The Unequal Economic Consequences of Carbon Pricing Diego R. Känzig
-
DOI: 10.1017/awf.2026.10115 2026
Part 1: Assessment of upright restraint of broilers for head-only electrical stunning Troy J. Gibson, Georgina Limon, Shannon Campbell, Natalie Chancellor, Katharine A Fletcher, Paul Berry, Jeff Lines
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.86 2026
MadAgents Tilman Plehn, Daniel Schiller, Nikita Schmal
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.86-r2.0 2026
Codebase release 2.0 for MadAgents Tilman Plehn, Daniel Schiller, Nikita Schmal
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.85 2026
svPITE: A Python package for the state-vector-based probabilistic imaginary-time evolution algorithm Pascal Sievers, Satoshi Ejima
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.85-r1.1 2026
Codebase release 1.1 for svPITE Pascal Sievers, Satoshi Ejima
-
DOI: 10.1177/02611929261494117 2026
The World Medical Association’s
Declaration of Helsinki
and
Statement on Animal Use in Biomedical Research
: Why reliable and valid preclinical evidence and Natalie Anderson, Jane Kotzmann, Rachel Smith, Kathrin Herrmann