Impact of Thermocycling and Artificial Aging on the Flexural Strength and Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Dental Ceramics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Joyce Michel Mora Bayas, Luis Chauca Bajaña, Carol Ortiz Bustamante, Andrea Ordoñez Balladares, Laly Viviana Cedeño Sánchez, Ricardo Saltos Noboa, Diana Carolina Sandoval Benalcázar, Thalia Gabriela Alvarez Centeno, Ivonne Carrion Bustamante, Carlos Salazar Minda, David Alfredo Flor Ronquillo, Byron Velasquez RonBackground: CAD/CAM dental ceramics are widely used for indirect restorations because of their favorable esthetic properties, biocompatibility, and mechanical performance. However, long-term exposure to thermal fluctuations, moisture, and cyclic loading may compromise their structural integrity. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of artificial aging protocols on the mechanical properties of CAD/CAM dental ceramics. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, Google Scholar, and ProQuest from inception to June 2026. In vitro studies evaluating CAD/CAM ceramics subjected to thermocycling and/or artificial aging protocols were included. The primary outcomes were flexural strength and fracture resistance. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) or pooled means with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were conducted according to ceramic category, and sensitivity analyses were performed using a leave-one-out approach. Results: Five studies comprising 16 independent comparisons were included in the flexural strength meta-analysis, while five studies contributed 11 comparisons to the fracture resistance analysis. Artificial aging protocols significantly reduced the flexural strength of CAD/CAM ceramics (SMD = −1.68; 95% CI: −2.28 to −1.08; p < 0.00001). The greatest reduction was observed in zirconia-based ceramics (SMD = −3.31), followed by hybrid/PICN ceramics (SMD = −1.37) and lithium disilicate/lithium silicate ceramics (SMD = −1.25). Feldspathic and glass-based ceramics showed no significant reduction. The pooled fracture resistance after aging was 1312.85 N (95% CI: 1131.59–1494.10 N), indicating that most CAD/CAM ceramics maintained clinically relevant fracture resistance despite aging. Conclusions: Artificial aging protocols adversely affect the flexural strength of CAD/CAM dental ceramics, particularly zirconia-based materials. Nevertheless, fracture resistance generally remains within clinically acceptable ranges. Material composition plays a critical role in determining susceptibility to aging-related degradation, highlighting the importance of ceramic selection for long-term restorative performance.