DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_606_26 ISSN: 0019-5049

Impact of targeted blood pressure management versus standard care amongst high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgeries: A pilot study

Madhubala Venkatesan, Lakshmi Kumar, Sudarsana P. Nagarajan, Ramya Anantharaman, Renjitha Bhaskaran

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims:

Targeting blood pressures closer to the patient’s normal could result in a reduction in post-operative morbidity amongst high-risk patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The study primarily evaluated the impact of targeted mean arterial pressure (MAP) (20% baseline) versus standard care on organ dysfunction. The secondary outcomes assessed were length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay along with all-cause mortality.

Methods:

Patients aged 45 years and above with diabetes mellitus, coronary artery, peripheral or cerebral vascular disease ( n = 130) undergoing major abdominal surgeries were randomised to either Group T (targeted MAP, n = 60) or Group S (standard care n = 70) and primary outcomes measured at 24 h. Lengths of ICU stay and hospital stay and all-cause mortality were noted.

Results:

Post-operative troponins, creatinine, platelet count, international normalised ratio, and cognitive and respiratory outcomes were comparable. The time-weighted average of MAP <65 mm Hg was 0.017 ± 0.127 mm Hg in Group T and 0.057 ± 0.295 mm Hg in Group S, P = 0.135, while the time spent within the target MAP range was higher in Group T, 91.3% versus 77.8%, P < 0.001. The ICU stay was 3.0 (2–4) vs. 4 (3.2–5) days, P < 0.001, and hospital stay 5 (4–6) vs. 6.0 (5–7) days ( P < 0.001) in Group S vs. Group T, while the mortality was comparable.

Conclusion:

Targeted blood pressure management in high-risk patients undergoing abdominal surgery did not result in differences in post-operative outcomes in comparison to the standard care. The lengths of ICU and hospital stay were longer in Group T, probably due to the higher risk profile of patients in this group.

More from our Archive