Impact of Concurrent Lower Limb Arthroplasty on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Single-Center Feasibility Analysis
Ahmad K. AlMekkawi, Dylan Glaser, Ali Ebada, Christopher Carron, Antonis Stylianou, Salah G. Aoun, Carlos A. BagleyStudy Design:
Retrospective single-center cohort study; exploratory feasibility analysis.
Objective:
To describe the feasibility and 12-month clinical and radiographic outcomes of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adult spinal deformity (ASD) with
Background:
Hip-spine and knee-spine syndromes describe the biomechanical interdependence of the lower extremities and the spine. Sequential surgical management is well described, but outcomes when arthroplasty and spinal fusion are performed during a single hospitalization remain poorly characterized.
Materials and Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 45 consecutive adult patients who underwent T12–pelvis PSF for ASD at a single academic center between January 2019 and December 2023. All patients received a standardized T12–pelvis construct with selective laminectomies at symptomatic levels. Patients who underwent concurrent lower limb arthroplasty under the same anesthetic event (concurrent group, n = 18; 16 TKA, 2 THA) were compared descriptively with those who underwent PSF alone (spine-only group, n = 27). Clinical outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index, VAS Back and Leg pain) and radiographic sagittal parameters (PI, LL, PT, SS, TK, TPA, SVA) were assessed at baseline and 12 months. Paired within-patient change was analyzed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank; between-group comparisons used Mann–Whitney
Results:
The concurrent group was significantly older (74.1 ± 6.1
Conclusions:
Concurrent lower limb arthroplasty with PSF under a single anesthetic event was feasible in this small ASD cohort, with comparable anesthesia time, length of stay, fusion rates among assessed patients, and structured complication rates. No statistically significant advantage was detected for clinical or radiographic outcomes after adjustment for age. These exploratory findings are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in prospective multi-institutional studies before any comparative effectiveness inference can be drawn.
Level of Evidence:
Level III, therapeutic.