In vitro metabolic signaling in two intestinal bacterial isolates: glutamate-driven transcriptional and functional reprogramming in Clostridium butyricum and

Monosodium glutamate (MSG; L-glutamate monosodium salt) is among the most widely used flavor enhancers, yet its molecular effects on gut microbial physiology remain poorly understood. Here, we examined the strain-specific transcriptomic and metabolic responses of Clostridium butyricum and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron grown in pure anaerobic culture with 0.1% (wt/vol) MSG. Although MSG exposure was not associated with major changes in total bacterial biomass dynamics, both species showed a temporal functional reprogramming. In C. butyricum , MSG rapidly intensified metabolic activity to capitalize on exogenous glutamate by activating central carbon metabolism, redox-balancing pathways, and the GABA shunt, thereby collectively enhancing butyrate synthesis, a metabolite associated with gut barrier integrity, energy regulation, and anti-inflammatory signaling. On the other hand, B. thetaiotaomicron adopted a conservative, homeostatic response, suppressing glycan utilization and central carbon and energy metabolism, and maintaining stable SCFA production through controlled regulation that buffered against abrupt dietary perturbations. Overall, MSG functioned as a potent metabolic signal, triggering distinct adaptive strategies in two dominant gut bacteria.

IMPORTANCE

The impact of monosodium glutamate (MSG) as a highly consumed food additive on the gut microbiome is often overlooked, and community-level analyses reveal little change, masking distinct phenotypic responses of individual strains. By combining gene expression and metabolite profiling using two key human gut bacteria, we show that MSG is sensed as a metabolic signal. A butyrate-producing gut bacterium increases energy metabolism and butyrate production, and a fiber-degrading gut bacterium transiently moderates metabolism to maintain stable fermentation products. These differences suggest that MSG's physiological effects may depend on which bacterial groups dominate an individual’s microbiome.